>.>485415
>>485381
>>485354
Guys, I thing I’m onto something. Check this out:
It pertains to the CIA’s Kryptos Sculpture. In this article [https:// www.wired.com/2014/11/second-kryptos-clue/ ], check out the following sentence, which I c/p’d:
“The first message is a poetic phrase that Sanborn composed:
“Between subtle shading and the absence of light lies the nuance of iqlusion.”
“Illusion” spelled with a “Q”.
And again:
"“Slowly, desparatly slowly, the remains of passage debris that encumbered the lower part of the doorway was removed. With trembling hands I made a tiny breach in the upper left-hand corner. And then, widening the hole a little, I inserted the candle and peered in. The hot air escaping from the chamber caused the flame to flicker, but presently details of the room within emerged from the mist. x Can you see anything? q”
Sanborn has said that the first three sections contain clues to solving the final 97 letters but no one has figured out what those might be. After no progress cracking the last section, Sanborn released the 'Berlin' clue four years ago, considering it 'a significant clue.'
'I’m throwing it out there. It just makes that many fewer characters people have to figure out,' he told WIRED at the time.
The six letters that spell 'Berlin'—NYPVTT—-are the 64th through 69th letters of the final 97 characters and the new clue 'clock'are deciphered from the next five letters that follow it."
TWICE "Q" has been placed in an article where it had absolutely NO business being, AND it's in the context of:
A) CIA
B) CLOCK
C) Cryptography/cipher
COINCIDENCE???
Getting excited…