>>4856209
right.
and now it remains to be seen who will step up from the D party and lie on the affidavit for each state as was done with the kenyan.
wasn't it pelosi that swore to every state but hawaii that obama was eligible to run for POTUS in the first place?
and that the affidavit was worded diff for hawaii since they had the actual certificate of a foreign birth?
who is stupid enough to step up for kameltoe?
from 2011:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2658757/postsRecall, over the past two years, we became familiar with the furor over the Democrat Party of Hawaii's refusal to certify Obama's constitutional eligibility. The DPH is the Democrat Party authority in charge of requesting, reviewing and verifying the legal qualifications of a candidates eligibility in compliance with Hawaiian election laws. . The DPH's refusal to certify Obama was due to a failure by Obama to make available the original documented evidence confirming his eligibility. This rightful, justified lack of certification was followed by a covert attempt by the Democratic National Committee to artificially declare Obama eligible in Hawaii by submitting two separate, sworn Official Certifications of Nomination (OCON) for Obama, each containing different legal language. Both versions of the OCON were sent to the Hawaiian Office of Elections while only one version was submitted to other states' Election authorities. As stated by Hawaii's Office of Elections website in 2008: . "The Official Certification of Nomination is a legally required document submitted by each party's state and national authority to every state elections committee authority prior to each presidential election. It affords the Chief Elections Officer in each state with the documented legal assurance that the candidates seeking inclusion on their state's ballot are indeed certified as constitutionally eligible to serve the office they seek".