Anonymous ID: a95fec Jan. 21, 2019, 8:16 p.m. No.4856216   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6247 >>6338 >>6381 >>6449 >>6548 >>6618

>>4855904

Don't expect him to do this for a while yet but I think it will be done hopefully sooner then later,,,..settle down you'll be OK

 

Some best possible outcomes of the shutdown

 

The longest-lasting partial federal government shutdown in U.S. history affords President Trump the opportunity to kill off an over-the-hill political spectacle, drain some of the swamp and maybe — just maybe — build the wall.

 

Trump is a disruptor and a breaker of political norms that need to be broken. Among the more irritating contemporary norms is the State of the Union address delivered to a joint session of Congress every January and televised nationwide during prime time

 

In the meantime, the president could do the country a favor and cull the federal workforce of nonessential bureaucrats.

 

Everyone knows the president cannot fire career government employees willy-nilly. Our civil service laws are ironclad. But a fairly obscure rule would allow the administration to lay off certain workers if they’ve been furloughed for at least 30 days. It’s called a “reduction in force” and it’s perfectly legal as long as the White House adheres to certain criteria, accounting for an employee’s tenure, total federal and military service, and work performance.

 

Guess what? About 350,000 nonessential federal employees have been on furlough since December 22. Those 30 days are coming up soon.

 

What purpose would a reduction in force serve? Simply put, it would knee-cap the “Resistance” that is working to undermine a duly-elected presidency from within.

 

“President Trump can end this abuse,” the official continued. “Senior officials can re-prioritize during an extended shutdown, focus on valuable results and weed out the saboteurs. We do not want most employees to return, because we are working better without them.”

 

The laid-off workers would scream, they would cry, they would certainly sue. And they might even prevail in the lower courts. But the Supreme Court would have the last word. How do you suppose that will go?

 

The simple fact remains that Trump is president. He runs the executive branch. He gets to make policy. He can be checked by Congress and the courts, but he has certain constitutional prerogatives — prerogatives that his predecessors exercised without issue — that don’t go away just because his name is “Trump.”

 

He also gets to follow through on the promises on which he campaigned.

 

https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/op-ed/ben-boychuk/article224651550.html

Anonymous ID: a95fec Jan. 21, 2019, 8:34 p.m. No.4856478   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4856417

Nobody is right if everybody is wrong… Take what you need and leave the rest,,, how did you ever make it through school and all the idiot liberal ,SJW teachers