Anonymous ID: b2c20f Jan. 21, 2019, 8:04 p.m. No.4856059   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6209

>>4855734 lb

 

You seem to have missed the part where I stated that "natural-born just means born on US soil without regard to parentage, until there is some legal case or statute that says otherwise. There isnt one to date, so it's not a settled question of law." 9 of 10 lawfags will agree on this, and the other one is lying.

 

>>4855795 lb

 

Yes.

 

>>4855818 lb

Anonymous ID: b2c20f Jan. 21, 2019, 8:07 p.m. No.4856091   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4855904

Trump has yet to do anything that ballsy to drain the swamp, I'm not holding my breath. He should though. Getting rid of 500,000 or so fed employees would be a good START.

Anonymous ID: b2c20f Jan. 21, 2019, 8:26 p.m. No.4856357   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6635

>>4856129

Legally, you are correct, however, the masonic police/court system will fine and lock you up for asserting your consitutional rights contra to the auto revenue scam.

Anonymous ID: b2c20f Jan. 21, 2019, 8:28 p.m. No.4856383   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6422 >>6662

>>4856131

That's incorrect, there is no such case about a person such as Harris. Imo, natural-born just means born here. Most lawfags will agree, because plain language prevails where there is no case or statute to the contrary.