>>4856635 lb
I've done the original research on this as a lawyer myself, and I've had a judge threaten to throw me in jail for asserting these legal principles. I'm miles ahead of you on this. Just try it, you'll find out.
>>4856422 lb
>>>4856662 lb
There's no case or statute that supports what you are saying. I did all the legal research on this in 2008.
>>4856542 lb
>>4856591 lb
You'll need a good attorney and bail if you try to assert in court what you do here.
>>4856662 lb
While some constitutional issues are truly difficult, with framing-era sources either nonexistent or contradictory, here, the relevant materials clearly indicate that a “natural born Citizen” means a citizen from birth with no need to go through naturalization proceedings. The Supreme Court has long recognized that two particularly useful sources in understanding constitutional terms are British common law
-
See Smith v. Alabama, 124 U.S. 465, 478 (1888).
and enactments of the First Congress.
-
See Wisconsin v. Pelican Ins. Co., 127 U.S. 265, 297 (1888).
Both confirm that the original meaning of the phrase “natural born Citizen” includes persons born abroad who are citizens from birth based on the citizenship of a parent. Harvard Law Review
https://harvardlawreview.org/2015/03/on-the-meaning-of-natural-born-citizen/