Anonymous ID: 4f8a79 Jan. 22, 2019, 12:41 a.m. No.4858489   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8536 >>8562

>>4858263

I went through getting off heavy weed use over a decade ago. I'm not anti weed (of course) and would sometimes use it side then if offered and in the right setting/circumstances. These days though I generally avoid it.

First thing I would say is find a GP who actually cares about their patients if the symptoms persist. The way my GP explained it is that using heavily it prevents seratonin uptake in your brain, since it doesn't need to utilize what your body produces it and gets lazy.

This is fine while you're using, but the pathways 'dry up', so when you stop using you don't immediately get the seratonin uptake back. Seratonin is important for sleep cycle regulation, mood, etc. Pretty important all round.

It can take years to get back to 'normal'. My GP gave me a drug to help with that and it seemed to work (don't know what it was unfortunately). But a healthy diet and sunshine/exercise etc will help. I think melatonin is used for seratonin production.

So yeah, give it time. Don't be afraid to use it again occasionally if you have the discipline to not get habitual again, but ultimately it's one of the downsides we don't get told about kek. There are much worse things out there imo.

Anonymous ID: 4f8a79 Jan. 22, 2019, 12:52 a.m. No.4858532   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4858445

I posted these earlier.

>>4855810 (pb)

I'm not sure why, but the focus or concern of Q on msm fuckery has declined significantly (at least that's my interpretation of why the maps look like that now).

We've just seen a couple of incontrovertible instances of fake news (buzzfeed, covington) so I think the corner has been turned for sure. Still a long way to go though.

Anonymous ID: 4f8a79 Jan. 22, 2019, 1:19 a.m. No.4858626   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4858600

I harbor no illusions of being truly anonymous.

Unless you build a computer from the silicon up (or go to extraordinary physical lengths) you'll never be sure, so it's not really worth worrying about.

I think the value of this anonymity is to bring everyone to the same level, and also have a 99.999% chance of having what you post seen by others and not shadow banned or deleted.

That being said, yeah, not gonna click that shit, no point making it really easy for them.

Anonymous ID: 4f8a79 Jan. 22, 2019, 1:24 a.m. No.4858642   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4858607

I use a microphone and camera blocker. I'm happy with the camera blocker as it uses a security policy. But the microphone blocker.. well that works by keeping the microphone open, so a huge level of trust there kek.

But I am pretty sure if someone is determined enough or has access to the back doors they're going to get in anyway. Locks keep honest people out as they say.

Anonymous ID: 4f8a79 Jan. 22, 2019, 2:34 a.m. No.4858846   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8853 >>8859 >>8999

>>4858839

Most countries have pretty strict laws about unauthorized access to computer systems.

Just because you have the keys doesn't mean you're allowed to drive the car…

Just saying anons. Could be an anon honeypot trap.