>>4861109

Reposting from end of last bread.

Tried building a new clock cause I feel like the current one isn't really giving us any kind of direction/confirmation.

Anyhow, directions at the top of the page say to look to Monticello, so I did, and modeled a clock on a BASE 48 rotation around the dial instead of BASE 60.

>"There need be no minute hand, as the hour figures will be 6. I. apart. But the interspace should be divided into [qu]arters and 5. minute marks." –Thomas Jefferson

>Similar to Jefferson's Great Clock at Monticello, the Q-Clock can be seen as only requiring a minute hand, which links dates & times by arranging a calendar around the clockface in a spiral, such that 12/07 is at the [:00] minute marker.

It's Ugly, and I'm tired. But putting it out there in case someone else wants to mess around with the idea.

BASE 48 around.

>>4862349

>>4862413

>>4864028

My thinking exactly. Breaking each our into QUarters, leads to 48 around.

A finalized version should then have each of those quarters broken down into thirds, 5 min markers for each 15 minutes.

Another issue I ran into was where to start the clock, since there are two fields beneath the XII in this model.

However, I opted to place 12/07 into the first field, because there's a Q drop on 12/07 that looks like it ends the whole shabang:

—end—

>>4865196

What's the difference between the gray and blue highlights on your clock? Before and after switch to 8ch?

>>4867803

I appreciate the offer to make one. I started painstaking making one in PowerPoint last night, which I think I'll just finish today. Finish what you start.

I don't quite know what to do with the 5 min subdivisions, but I'm thinking they may be a key to highlighting which posts are relevant in a given vein. Maybe the deltas between a POTUS tweet and Q drop indicate which marker to utilize. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

>>4867803

>>4865500

>>4864949

>>4864028

>>4862349

>>4861570

New Alt Q Clock based on the Jefferson Great Clock.

Have yet to play with it and see if it does anything better or worse. Will do some testing now. But voilà:

>>4873726

First grasp.

With the "two days ahead of schedule", 3:15 on Alt Clock lines up with January 7.

>>4874311

Excellent man. I'm in the process of making a graphic grouping all the posts at 5 on the clock, since in this version, there's two fields beneath each major numeral. Could be the "5:5" posts.

Anyhow, correlating them to see if there's anything interesting.

Regarding the markers around the clock - there's a total of 48 fields around, each representing a 15 min quarter. I guess simplest way would be to assign them 1-48.

As for the red text, the sub-divisions in 5 min markers, not sure what to do with those just yet. Maybe they're a key as to what posts to look in any given alignment, but grasping at a wisp with that.

>>4873925

>>4874421

These are the posts that align to 5 o'clock on Alt clock.

>>4883244

Thanks for making a Pro-looking version, it's looking fantastic.

>Understood for not adding to the confusion by posting it in General.

Regarding the confirmations on the 60-clock, I'm not trying to take anything away from other anons on those. I just feel like the current read on the clock is either a "half-read", or there's something off with the clock.

Q wants us to be able to decode the drops, hence this whole exercise. As "Future proves past", a correctly decoded clock will help to foster trust in the drops.

The drops as they stand read like horoscopes - you can maybe make associations here and there - and occasionally a marker seems to line up amid the digital noise.

Attached are today's line-up on the 60 clock.

For the Monticello clock, today's relevant drops would be:

11/18/2017

01/05/2018

02/22/2018

04/11/2018

09/02/2018

12/07/2018

And if we're two days ahead of schedule:

11/20/2017

01/07/2018

02/24/2018

04/13/2018

09/04/2018

>>4886754

We can keep an eye on the news today/POTUS twitter and see if anything clicks.

Monticello Clock - Today's aligning drops:

>>4886754

Monticello Clock - Today's aligning drops with "two days ahead":

>>4895842

OMG I love this gif.

Thanks for putting in the work. Will definitely play with the program.

>>4894229

On the Monticello clock today. Ties in with CNN and Stone reports. Could be coincidence, but posting.