"Think clock. Wind the clock w/ all markers."

"There need be no minute hand, as the hour figures will be 6. I. apart. But the interspace should be divided into [qu]arters and 5. minute marks."

–Thomas Jefferson

Similar to Jefferson's Great Clock at Monticello, the Q-Clock can be seen as only requiring a minute hand, which links dates & times by arranging a calendar around the clockface in a spiral, such that 12/07 is at the [:00] minute marker.

By "winding the clock" in a certain way, Q's posts can be connected to each other, and thus reveal the MAP which provides the KEY to spread the TRUTH.

—————————————————————————————————————

"Timestamps important. Countdown? Markers."

"Connect the 'markers.' News (in all forms) unlocks the map."

"TRUTH shines LIGHT. LIGHT saves HUMANITY. Future proves past."

–Q

—————————————————————————————————————

Notables from last Bread

>>4420983 — A Circle with a Tale. Da Vinci's Vitruvian Man as another way of partitioning the clock?

>>4434462 — Legend for markers & historic happenings connected to them

>>4436177 — Bun of How-to posts (clockbread #6) describing timestamp cipher (POTUS tweets)

>>4442712 — Government Shutdown & Winter Solstice 2018: Another kind of Christmas Surprise (also >>4443039 )

>>4445218 — ENOU[G]H IS EN[O]UGH: Game Over for Bob Corker

>>4492971 — Another way of interpreting POTUS' capitalization of some words?

>>4494732 — How to draw a Red Line? Right-angled red lines via [30], [45] & [00] (also >>4495640 )

>>4569686 — Sanctions Are Coming. Date changed to Nov, 4th @ Cabinet Meeting (originally by non-clockfag >>4568342 , also: >>4589219 )

>>4702557 — RBG on the clock

>>4760178 — Keystone Clock Theory as a way of sorting/sectioning Q Posts & markers? (among others also >>4769300 & >>4771597 )

>>4788214 — Could markers (also) be meant to correspond to names?

>>4801675 — Remember This Day. Keystone clock and a historic Christmas Surprise: Get the popcorn.

>>4804333 — 4,10,20: A collection of Q posts

>>4817794 — The End of MSM Fake News in a cross-pattern

>>4857296 — Is the Clock to be used as a kind of Compass to read the Map?

Tweets, timestamps, deltas & cipher continued here (PosterID: ef1dca), and has during the course of this thread been split off to another thread. God Bless our CipherAnon! You'll be missed.

Check >>4557354 for more results.

Some Useful Resources

→ Convert timezones depending on date — www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html

→ Compute number of days (+ other units) b/w two dates — www.timeanddate.com/date/duration.html

→ Online Cipher Tools for various ciphers — rumkin.com/tools/cipher

→ Trump Twitter Archive — trumptwitterarchive.com/archive

→ Deleted tweets from @realDonaldTrump — factba.se/topic/deleted-tweets

→ All of SOCF's graphics in an online archive — q-clock.com

→ QClockView – A software to browse, read & analyze Q posts — mega.nz/#F!yX430T5L!BZYfnSxftcSqewvZuknnCQ

→ HTML of all Q Posts for offline use (incl. headerLines in three timezones) — mega.nz/#F!iLwgXKRb!XvA-cUt5-8XyRPlgoVH-FQ

→ Archive (copies of 8chan HTML, incl. images) of previous clockBreads — mega.nz/#F!uaoQEKDD!bzufzJagvg7_nHz6Oyftng

Example of How to Build a QClock Graphic

To this day, the exact word "clock" has been mentioned in Q's posts 10 times, most instructively in sentences as "Wind the CLOCK." & "The CLOCK and the GRAPHIC are ESSENTIAL.".

Combined with the numerous times Q referred to times or markers of the form "[NN]", stated that "News unlocks map." and asked us to "Learn to read the map.", Anons figured out pretty fast that beyond the mere posting of "crumbs" there must be some way to meaningfully connect news (of any form, incl. tweets), Q posts & markers (i.e. timestamps & dates) in order to form some kind of "graphic", which would facilitate or even extend an understanding of the information given.

The QClock is merely a vehicle to connect dates & times to the hands on a clock ("Clock started" 07-Dec-2017), which can be used to visualize how current happenings (i.e. news & their times/dates) plausibly relate to Q "crumbs" from the past, thus serving as both, confirmation & explanation of what Q has posted previously and not rarely cryptically ("Future proves past.").

One textbook-like example appeared in Clockbread #4, which in clarity, consistency & simple beauty stood out remarkably, which is why it is given here as an example for old & new clockfags on how to build a QClock Graphic.

Even though the possibilities of what the clock might be used for, and how exactly it is to be used as a KEY to read the MAP is still not fully understood, the established and quite straight forward way of associating Q Posts via their timestamps and corresponsing markers seems to be quite promising.

An anon has posted a short clip on Youtube, which here shall be posted to serve as a primer & simple introduction on how to use it.

>>4861274

Don't mention – t'was a close call. Read >>4861378 for explanation.

For those who use them, as usual, here's the current clock blanks and the tweets as I collected them this morning, plus the postMarker stats, which aren't so far off from the recently introduced "Keystone Clock".

>>4864603

Very much appreciated, dear fellow!

I figured that the video is somehow associated to you as I took the link from q-clock.com – wasn't sure if you'd allow me to post it here, but nonetheless did.

I liked it (also the speaker), as it keeps things simple, and I consider it a pleasant introduction into what can be done with the clock. Tried to express it that way in the post.

Wouldn't be able to say if I'd be living in the LIGHT, as I am forced to live in this western society w/o being too independent (financially). At some point I decided to retreat into some unknown, rarely visited corner (intellectually) to have my peace & still be able to learn and work on interesting things.

As things stand, obviously, I wasn't able to completely retreat, since I am here …..

Was really a hard one to decide to go on with this thread, as mentioned in my post above – in case we'll disband at some point, I wanted to let you know that you can (if you want to of course) make use of the QClockView – either link to it on q-clock.com, or even upload/post it there.

Even if I should feel like abandoning this fight (now even against anons accusing us of shilling, fame- & moneyfagging, which I am most certainly not), I'll keep updating the program.

Was looking for an email or anything on q-clock.com but didn't find any. In the worst case I'll certainly find a way to inform you about updates or progress, just if we shouldn't have this (clock thread) platform anymore.

Thanks for all you do! Great to know to have another LIGHTbearer here – would be more than a pleasure to indeed have that beer(s) one day!

>>4865325

>>4865500

If you feel like it, you can well ignore the difference in colors. When I did that it served merely to make a difference b/w Q posts made before and after the assumed start of the clock.

I, for one, treat them the same when reading/grouping crumbs, with the small difference that I have a visual help to keep the start of the clock in the back of my head, and which posts where before that.

>>4864028

>>4864800

What would indeed make much more of a difference, specifically in arranging the dates around the clock and thus their correspondence to eachother, is the modulo 48 vs. modulo 60 (not base48) math that would come with a Monticello clock.

I could w/o too many difficulties/time produces an image for you that arranges 48 dates around the clock – just for us to have a visual impression of which dates would line up in that case.

With having Jefferson's quote up in the dough for the last 6 breads, it would be funny if that were indeed the case, as that'd be a typical case of me playing "Blind-man's buff" … Kek!

What significance would the 5 min subdivisions have in your opinion?

>>4868188

>Please keep the threads going.

Just for a short explanation: If the clock really would be "Q's Baby" or anything that's "essential" indeed, and given the reactions of the anons in the General (incl. the accusations, shilling & division – not withstanding differences b/w nightshift & dayshift, the former often being much more tolerant or understanding even) – and also if "POTUS were a clockfag" (as has been said occasionally), then why doesn't Q simply make a three-word point (like "Q-Clock is BS")?

This way, now we have three threads, closely related, and the handful of (original) clockfags essentially ousted, plus less ideas/input from "fresh eyes/minds".

Seeing qmap.pub asking for monetary support as of recently, what have "the clockfags" done wrong?

Now, there's several possibilities what might have gone wrong, or that we have focused too much on what we assume is correct and the "old" ways of interpreting the clock.

However, at least I for myself can say that I always saw it as an imperfect and still unfinished work, knowing that we still may not have found the entire solution to this (possible) riddle.

Not that I care much about being here in our "confinement thread" – but why continue something out in the open (that I am not even sure about if it's really accurate), draw fire, cause division and grow gray hair, when "nothing can stop what is coming" anyways?

Just my thoughts – let's see …

>>4873726

Thanks. Must've been tedious work. Well done – looks great.

Wouldn't even matter much if you'd rotate the "calendar" by 7.5/2 deg, and thus have the days align w/ the separation lines (then the hands @ 3:15 would indeed show 3:15 & 05/01 → >>4873925 ).

How would the [markers] be distributed??

'round the clock from [0] to [47]?

Checked the Q posts for highest number of format "[X]" – seems like the largest I found was [48] from:

"We await your answer [48]." – but that could have been a time (like 48 hrs).

Next lower was [44] from:

"[44] remaining."

Also found [53] thru [59], but those were literature citations indices (probably from wikipedia or such), and [89], [187], [666] & [381937821] – all from stringers, so probably no [markers].

A classical 60-min clock seemed quite matching specifically since we had no posts at the [25] marker during the first few rounds … forming that "Q" in the pattern, if you remember.

Will see how hard it would be to have a Monticello clock in QClockView (as an option) – then probably searching/grouping posts would be much faster for comparison and testing/research ….

>>4874421

Got the thing almost ready (pic). There's some final tests to do & minor things to connect from the main interface.

I'd like to "Bake it safe" (as always, kek!) – so I'll finish these small things & only upload a first version with the Monticello Clock tomorrow.

However, and when testing/grouping posts, not only the "Q" which was formed in the 60 markers clock

>>4877814

but also the single post from 06/03 last year, timestamped at 02:58 – the exact "Q-CalendarTime" of that day – was quite a strong indication that the 60-marker clock might be the correct one.

Also we lose the 5–55 mirror symmetry with only 48 markers.

Also the pen pictures from the OriginalClockfag (who worked with the table initially) ……

However all this may be, it wasn't too hard to implement, and also we have this Jefferson quote in the dough, so I think it's indeed a new & interesting idea, and I have no clue if by Q's standards it should be 60 or 48 clock markers.

But please, kindly, remember the confusion of the anons in the General with the "regular" clock already – imagine what challenge it may be for some of them to even read & then deal with/wind a 48-marker Jefferson clock ….

I would suggest to keep it here for now in order to avoid further confusion & attacks until we've established if there are enough solid reasons in order to say which of the clocks may be the better/more likely one intended by Q. But that's just my suggestion/opinion ….

>>4886508

>>4886754

>>4887006

Have just uploaded the new version which has Jefferson's (outside) Monticello Great Clock as an option.

mega.nz/#F!yX430T5L!BZYfnSxftcSqewvZuknnCQ

So far all options (also markings) should work – except that when selecting "All days marked" in the postList, I did only just now notice that posts before the assumed start of the clock (i.e. the gray-shaded ones), are missing from the list.

Currently don't have an idea why, but will try to fix this immediately.

Should still be good for a try-out. Please let me know in case you notice other problems/issues – could probably fix these as well before uploading again.

>>4894229

>posts before the assumed start of the clock (i.e. the gray-shaded ones), are missing from the list.

Not even sure if it was a bug – might have done it on purpose back then, but it's fixed.

Have updated the blanks after Q's short re-appearance today – posting them together with POTUS' tweets, as usual.

Have also done some bug fixing in the QClockView & uploaded a version, with some of the small bugs fixed which came when including the Jefferson clock, specifically with the 5:5 mirrors, which for [25]:[55] wouldn't show correctly. Should be working as expected now.

Last bread+images are also up on mega.nz – other than that I hope to have a bit more time in the coming week for regular clockfagging.

While busy a bit irl too often currently, I'm quite enjoying what's being done here! Thank you, fellow clockfags, for your work, your persistence & loyalty!

>>5003397

>Next thing you know

What can they do ? – and I'm intentionally not using (((they))).

Because, yes, I do think, that it is not improbable that technology exists which "knows"/"sees" more than we think is possible to know & see.

If not, Kek wilt it!