Anonymous ID: bff874 Feb. 24, 2018, 3:22 p.m. No.486512   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6525 >>6576 >>6664

>>486401

Guys, as much as I think David Remnick is a filthy animal, this theory about Lunev/BHO is missing something. Why would a KGB colonel need to come over here to groom a young BHO? There aren't any socialists in America to groom him? The only way it makes sense is if Lunev is the guy who is communicating KGB directives to Hussein. And for that to make sense, Putin would still have to secretly be a communist. That's bullshit. That turns everything around and makes the MSM pushing this "Russia, Russia" shit into the good guys after all. No. The communists we have to worry about are not Putin and Russia. They're the ones in the clowns and media, etc.

Anonymous ID: bff874 Feb. 24, 2018, 3:46 p.m. No.486700   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>486654

I wasn't thinking he would agree to it, but that he would be exchanged for Lunev. Both of them so that they could face punishment when they got back to their respective countries. I'm looking at Q saying "Lunev. The Bridge. PAYBACK for today."

Anonymous ID: bff874 Feb. 24, 2018, 3:54 p.m. No.486757   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6817

>>486711

Interesting. I was translating a German article the other day about how Merkel's family and friends were deeply involved with the Stasi in East Germany. So there's at least some negative press about her.

 

In light of the discussion about Lunev, it's even more interesting. If Lunev is a sleeper agent and so is Merkel from previous communist regimes, you'd have to wonder how many more there are and who is coordinating this.

Anonymous ID: bff874 Feb. 24, 2018, 4:03 p.m. No.486889   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7049

>>486756

Yeah, I don't think Putin is working for the illuminati either. I think he's demonized for moving Russia toward orthodoxy again, even if it is more form than substance. Satan can easily pretend to drive out Satan and be an angel of light, but it's hard to get any clear sense whether that is happening in Russia, because everything American/Western media says about him is suspect.

 

But it seems certain to me that the US deep state is committed in its opposition to Putin and not just pretending. If it were to turn out that Putin is really the bad guy after all that would tend to validate all the MSM's propaganda against Trump.

Anonymous ID: bff874 Feb. 24, 2018, 4:08 p.m. No.486953   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7068

>>486846

It should not. I was responding to the papist talking about the Fatima prophecy of the conversion of Russia. In 1917, prior to Vatican II, that would not have meant "conversion to whatever form of Christianity," it would have meant "conversion to Rome," since back then Rome said you couldn't be saved outside of communion with the pope.

Anonymous ID: bff874 Feb. 24, 2018, 4:19 p.m. No.487059   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>486894

Thanks for moving this along. Too much fluff right now.

 

If this theory is right, a couple of questions arise:

  1. is Lunev actually a communist sleeper agent? If so, is there a "command center" of unrepentant KGB/Stasi former insiders that are coordinating?

  2. If not, if he was actually a guy who defected honestly, wouldn't it be immoral to send him back to Russia to be punished?

 

A related q. to number 2: didn't he defect in the 90s, after the Soviet Union fell apart? If so, it couldn't be because of disgust with communism. What were his motivations for defecting?

Anonymous ID: bff874 Feb. 24, 2018, 4:23 p.m. No.487102   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7123

>>486910

The reason, acc. to US media:

 

The bill that includes the adoption ban was drafted in response to the Magnitsky Act, a law signed by President Obama this month that will bar Russian citizens accused of violating human rights from traveling to the United States and from owning real estate or other assets there. The Obama administration had opposed the Magnitsky legislation, fearing diplomatic retaliation, but members of Congress were eager to press Russia over human rights abuses and tied the bill to another measure granting Russia new status as a full trading partner.

 

http:// www.nytimes.com/2012/12/28/world/europe/putin-to-sign-ban-on-us-adoptions-of-russian-children.html