Guys, as much as I think David Remnick is a filthy animal, this theory about Lunev/BHO is missing something. Why would a KGB colonel need to come over here to groom a young BHO? There aren't any socialists in America to groom him? The only way it makes sense is if Lunev is the guy who is communicating KGB directives to Hussein. And for that to make sense, Putin would still have to secretly be a communist. That's bullshit. That turns everything around and makes the MSM pushing this "Russia, Russia" shit into the good guys after all. No. The communists we have to worry about are not Putin and Russia. They're the ones in the clowns and media, etc.
I always buy my guns everytime there is a terrorist event or a school shooting, because scared I won't be able to get the ones I haven't bought yet if I don't get them then.
My spidey sense tells me the Russians are good guys and are demonized because they haven't yet bent the knee. And because they don't allow sodomite parades.
that's what I'm saying; that's why the Lunev/Hussein theory doesn't work for me. I don't know if Lunev is trustworthy, but I don't buy that Putin is masterminding a communist takeover of the US. And don't see how Lunev could be doing it all by himself.
Makes more sense to me than the other theory.
The part we keep leaving out is Q saying "Payback for today." Payback for what today? Maybe Snowden did some dirty deeds today, so POTUS is going to agree to give them Lunev in exchange for putting Snowden in Gitmo. What might Snowden have done today?
I totally think Hussein is a communist. Just doesn't make sense that Lunev somehow needs to be his mastermind. There are plenty of communists here, like Alinsky, to begin with.
He rented an apartment. 365 Broadway, Somerville, MA. No "housemaster" that I am aware of. If you know something, let us know.
I wasn't thinking he would agree to it, but that he would be exchanged for Lunev. Both of them so that they could face punishment when they got back to their respective countries. I'm looking at Q saying "Lunev. The Bridge. PAYBACK for today."
Missed that discussion. Why 4/2?
Interesting. I was translating a German article the other day about how Merkel's family and friends were deeply involved with the Stasi in East Germany. So there's at least some negative press about her.
In light of the discussion about Lunev, it's even more interesting. If Lunev is a sleeper agent and so is Merkel from previous communist regimes, you'd have to wonder how many more there are and who is coordinating this.
No, I got that.
Thanks anon
Would truly be a miracle if Russia converted from orthodoxy and became Papist.
Yeah, I don't think Putin is working for the illuminati either. I think he's demonized for moving Russia toward orthodoxy again, even if it is more form than substance. Satan can easily pretend to drive out Satan and be an angel of light, but it's hard to get any clear sense whether that is happening in Russia, because everything American/Western media says about him is suspect.
But it seems certain to me that the US deep state is committed in its opposition to Putin and not just pretending. If it were to turn out that Putin is really the bad guy after all that would tend to validate all the MSM's propaganda against Trump.
It should not. I was responding to the papist talking about the Fatima prophecy of the conversion of Russia. In 1917, prior to Vatican II, that would not have meant "conversion to whatever form of Christianity," it would have meant "conversion to Rome," since back then Rome said you couldn't be saved outside of communion with the pope.
It would be worse. Orthodoxy and papism are both false, though, soโฆI guess if you have to pick which one is worse, the church of the antichrist is definitely worse.
Hogg tie and gag him
Thanks for moving this along. Too much fluff right now.
If this theory is right, a couple of questions arise:
-
is Lunev actually a communist sleeper agent? If so, is there a "command center" of unrepentant KGB/Stasi former insiders that are coordinating?
-
If not, if he was actually a guy who defected honestly, wouldn't it be immoral to send him back to Russia to be punished?
A related q. to number 2: didn't he defect in the 90s, after the Soviet Union fell apart? If so, it couldn't be because of disgust with communism. What were his motivations for defecting?
The reason, acc. to US media:
The bill that includes the adoption ban was drafted in response to the Magnitsky Act, a law signed by President Obama this month that will bar Russian citizens accused of violating human rights from traveling to the United States and from owning real estate or other assets there. The Obama administration had opposed the Magnitsky legislation, fearing diplomatic retaliation, but members of Congress were eager to press Russia over human rights abuses and tied the bill to another measure granting Russia new status as a full trading partner.
http:// www.nytimes.com/2012/12/28/world/europe/putin-to-sign-ban-on-us-adoptions-of-russian-children.html
Homosexuals should have rights to not be beaten in the street, but they should not have the right to call their relationships "marriage", or to shut down businesses that don't want to participate in the celebration of their faggotry.
Yeah, no.