>>4864376 {lb}

>What do you need an ID for? List. Compare. Laugh.

We don't need IDs when we write books like the "Book of Q Proofs" but such books are few and far between.

Bullshit like "List - compare - laugh" is right up there with "eat pray love."

>Graphic is necessary and vital.

OK

>Time stamp(s) and order [is] critical.

We don't really know what timestamps mean. A few dozen fags think that they know, and many fags believe them, but we don't have that down to a real science.

>Re-review graphic (in full) each day post news release.

Well, we can review notables.

>Learn to distinguish between relevant/non-relevant news.

There are a million Anons and a million shills here and each one of us believes that he has the correct judgement about what is relevant. None of us agree about much.

>Think mirror.

I have seen many words written, proving anything the author cares to prove, based on this simple, highly ambiguous starting point. "Think mirror." That could mean anything. And when conspiracy theorists start writing, it will mean three contradictory things before the first paragraph is done.

>Look there, or [here], or there, truth is behind you.

Now you are being obscurantist.

>Think direction.

Ambiguous.

>Think full picture.

Most of us don't claim to have a full picture. Maybe if you DECLAS more details we could build more of a picture.

>Follow the bloodlines.

Okay, I actually have that task covered. The bloodlines can be documented. The activities of the Jewish bloodlines are not going to be easy to discuss in the USA's current judeolatrous environment, but I can definitely document those bloodlines. At least the bloodlines of goy psychopaths are going to be easy to publicize.