Anonymous ID: e8c8d9 Jan. 22, 2019, 2:03 p.m. No.4864751   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4758

>>4864734

 

I don't think he'll RIF the labor up front directly.

I think he wants Mulvaney's reorg implemented first.

And that's eligible for a back-door implementation, too.

Anonymous ID: e8c8d9 Jan. 22, 2019, 2:09 p.m. No.4864814   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4834

>>4864758

 

With seniority (pre-Bammy) folks eligible to bid for new positions.

And newer folks that lose the musical chairs off to private employment with a nice severance to dampen the optics.

Maybe he does that / maybe not / but moar likely something like that and not mass pink slips up front.

Anonymous ID: e8c8d9 Jan. 22, 2019, 2:12 p.m. No.4864850   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4867

>>4864769

>No deals.

 

Very early Q seems to have a special circumstances clause:

 

Q15 - Deals must be cut - corruption so bad and so pervasive

Q68 - D's dropping HRC - were deals cut with Select D's?

Anonymous ID: e8c8d9 Jan. 22, 2019, 2:28 p.m. No.4865054   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5156

>>4865008

 

The most interdasting Select D's would be Senate Dems.

What if for the big stuff needing 60-40 POTUS suddenly has the votes?

Chuckie loses leadership and Nancy all alone in the spotlight.

Wut then Dims?