>>4867017

>We think this sealed case is about a foreign corporation, but this grand jury appeal seems to indicate this case may involve a Foreign Government, also.

>UK, Aus?

I thought FVEY when I read it

Also telling is this…

Because of the sealing order in place, we will refer to

Petitioner—a wholly owned agency or instrumentality of a

foreign state—as "Country A."

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-948/81196/20190122085546947_00000001.pdf

>>4867339

>If we don't fuck with them (criminal/legal charges against a Foreign State), they won't fuck with us.

Add this with that…

>>4867017

Country A says they are a WITNESS

Earlier this year, the U.S. Government served a

grand jury subpoena on country A. S. App. 8a.

Country A understands that it is a witness in the

investigation.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-948/81196/20190122085546947_00000001.pdf