Anonymous ID: 724bc4 Jan. 22, 2019, 6:02 p.m. No.4867682   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7717 >>7758 >>7944 >>8025 >>8127 >>8231

>>4867648

 

fake and gay.

 

this link debunks all your shill garbage:

 

http://talmud.faithweb.com/

 

no wonder you are so afraid.

 

oh wait, what's this? all your garbage is taken from the "book" called "talmud unmasked"!

 

>talmud unmasked, a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861–1917).

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked

 

The author is the same clown that was exposed as a complete fraud in the Beilis trial.

He was brought over as an "expert", and got completely exposed as a fraud:

 

>One prosecution witness, presented as a religious expert in Judaic rituals, was a Catholic priest, Justinas Pranaitis from Tashkent, well known for his antisemitic 1892 work Talmud Unmasked. Pranaitis testified that the murder of Yushchinsky was a religious ritual, associating the murder of Yushchinsky with the blood libel, a legend believed by many Russians at the time.

 

>Pranaitis' credibility rapidly evaporated when the defense demonstrated his ignorance of some simple Talmudic concepts and definitions, such as hullin,[1]:p.215 to the point where "many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer."[3]

 

>A Beilis Defense Committee advisor, a writer named Ben-Zion Katz, suggested countering Father Pranaitis with questions like "When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity" which he described as the equivalent of asking an American "Who lived at the Gettysburg Address?" There were enough Jews in the court for the resultant laughter to negate Pranatis' value to the prosecution.[1]:pp.214-216

 

KEK!

 

>A Tsarist secret police agent is quoted, reporting on Pranaitis' testimony, as saying: Cross-examination of Pranaitis has weakened evidentiary value of his expert opinion, exposing lack of knowledge of texts, insufficient knowledge of Jewish literature. Because of amateurish knowledge and lack of resourcefulness, Pranaitis' expert opinion is of very low value.

 

KEK!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menahem_Mendel_Beilis

 

let the shill kvetching begin!

Anonymous ID: 724bc4 Jan. 22, 2019, 6:22 p.m. No.4867987   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8077

>>4867910

 

i kinda miss him. He was genuinely funny. A nice comic break made by an anon, unlike this multi ip repetitive muhjew garbage. Every night same shit being spammed.

Anonymous ID: 724bc4 Jan. 22, 2019, 6:28 p.m. No.4868080   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8099 >>8100 >>8108 >>8124 >>8134 >>8157

>>4868051

 

you are not the smartest shill in the office aren't you?

 

Payseur?

Saud?

Rockefeller?

Soros who is a nazi collaborator, a self proclaimed god and an atheist?

Roths and their minerva and egyptian occultism garbage?

 

Why would so many jews be against the so called "jewish conspiracy"?

Ivanka, Jared, Horowitz, Mnuchin and so many in the Trump cabinet?

Does it make sense?

 

Why did q emphasize that it was never about religion, race or color, but it is in fact global sheep vs global ruling elites?

 

You are making a fool out of yourselves, the jews are a time tested decoy, the last line of defense.

Anonymous ID: 724bc4 Jan. 22, 2019, 6:38 p.m. No.4868213   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8242

>>4868134

 

<pilpul

 

again, keywords, projection and no arguments.

 

Roths hide under the jewish banner to play the victim card while they are in fact a silent aggressor against jews and non jews.

 

Rulers don't care about the religion of the sheep or its race.

 

Why would so many jews be against the so called "jewish conspiracy"?

 

Ivanka, Jared, Horowitz, Mnuchin and so many in the Trump cabinet?

 

Does it make sense?

 

Why did q emphasize that it was never about religion, race or color, but it is in fact global sheep vs global ruling elites?

 

Never go full retarded, not even when shilling.