dChan
Anonymous ID: d79110 Jan. 22, 2019, 6:48 p.m. No.4868339   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8349 >>8385 >>8424 >>8583 >>8607 >>8623 >>8664 >>8741 >>8750 >>8761 >>8868

>>4868331

 

this link debunks all your shill garbage:

 

http://talmud.faithweb.com/

 

no wonder you are so afraid.

 

oh wait, what's this? all your garbage is taken from the "book" called "talmud unmasked"!

 

>talmud unmasked, a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861–1917).

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked

 

The author is the same clown that was exposed as a complete fraud in the Beilis trial.

He was brought over as an "expert", and got completely exposed as a fraud:

 

>One prosecution witness, presented as a religious expert in Judaic rituals, was a Catholic priest, Justinas Pranaitis from Tashkent, well known for his antisemitic 1892 work Talmud Unmasked. Pranaitis testified that the murder of Yushchinsky was a religious ritual, associating the murder of Yushchinsky with the blood libel, a legend believed by many Russians at the time.

 

>Pranaitis' credibility rapidly evaporated when the defense demonstrated his ignorance of some simple Talmudic concepts and definitions, such as hullin,[1]:p.215 to the point where "many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer."[3]

 

>A Beilis Defense Committee advisor, a writer named Ben-Zion Katz, suggested countering Father Pranaitis with questions like "When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity" which he described as the equivalent of asking an American "Who lived at the Gettysburg Address?" There were enough Jews in the court for the resultant laughter to negate Pranatis' value to the prosecution.[1]:pp.214-216

 

KEK!

 

>A Tsarist secret police agent is quoted, reporting on Pranaitis' testimony, as saying: Cross-examination of Pranaitis has weakened evidentiary value of his expert opinion, exposing lack of knowledge of texts, insufficient knowledge of Jewish literature. Because of amateurish knowledge and lack of resourcefulness, Pranaitis' expert opinion is of very low value.

 

KEK!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menahem_Mendel_Beilis

 

let the shill kvetching begin!

Anonymous ID: d79110 Jan. 22, 2019, 7:13 p.m. No.4868664   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8700 >>8713 >>8731 >>8786

>>4868623

>>4868621

>>4868633

>>4868640

>>4868619

>>4868640

 

<we

 

again the shill plural talk, as if you represent anyone but your faggot self.

 

still kvetching and running away from this:

 

>>4868339

 

carry on faggots,

 

<but muhjews

 

Why would so many jews be against the so called "jewish conspiracy"?

Ivanka, Jared, Horowitz, Mnuchin and so many in the Trump cabinet?

Does it make sense?

 

Why did q emphasize that it was never about religion, race or color, but it is in fact global sheep vs global ruling elites?

 

You are making a fool out of yourselves, the jews are a time tested decoy, the last line of defense.

Anonymous ID: d79110 Jan. 22, 2019, 7:18 p.m. No.4868728   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8746

>>4868634

 

Payseur?

Saud?

Rockefeller?

Soros who is a nazi collaborator, a self proclaimed god and an atheist?

Roths and their minerva and egyptian occultism garbage?

 

Why would so many jews be against the so called "jewish conspiracy"?

Ivanka, Jared, Horowitz, Mnuchin and so many in the Trump cabinet?

Does it make sense?

 

Why did q emphasize that it was never about religion, race or color, but it is in fact global sheep vs global ruling elites?

 

You are making a fool out of yourselves, the jews are a time tested decoy, the last line of defense.

 

<but muhjews were expelled

 

this number includes cities, not countries alone. there were never 109 countries in the middle ages. it is fake and gay subversive (pun intended) bullshit.

 

Why were they expelled? cause in the middle ages they were allowed to either run a small shop or do money loans for the "righteous christian" monarchs and aristocrats. They were expelled cause the ruler had to blame someone other than himself when the sheep became mad.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_Jew

Anonymous ID: d79110 Jan. 22, 2019, 7:23 p.m. No.4868794   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8810 >>8829 >>8853 >>8881 >>8958 >>9021

>>4868757

>>4868621

 

this "book" repeats the same garbage that was written in the "talmud unmasked" crap from 1898":

 

>talmud unmasked, a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861–1917).

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked

 

The author is the same clown that was exposed as a complete fraud in the Beilis trial.

 

He was brought over as an "expert", and got completely exposed as a fraud:

 

>One prosecution witness, presented as a religious expert in Judaic rituals, was a Catholic priest, Justinas Pranaitis from Tashkent, well known for his antisemitic 1892 work Talmud Unmasked. Pranaitis testified that the murder of Yushchinsky was a religious ritual, associating the murder of Yushchinsky with the blood libel, a legend believed by many Russians at the time.

 

>Pranaitis' credibility rapidly evaporated when the defense demonstrated his ignorance of some simple Talmudic concepts and definitions, such as hullin,[1]:p.215 to the point where "many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer."[3]

 

>A Beilis Defense Committee advisor, a writer named Ben-Zion Katz, suggested countering Father Pranaitis with questions like "When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity" which he described as the equivalent of asking an American "Who lived at the Gettysburg Address?" There were enough Jews in the court for the resultant laughter to negate Pranatis' value to the prosecution.[1]:pp.214-216

 

KEK!

 

>A Tsarist secret police agent is quoted, reporting on Pranaitis' testimony, as saying: Cross-examination of Pranaitis has weakened evidentiary value of his expert opinion, exposing lack of knowledge of texts, insufficient knowledge of Jewish literature. Because of amateurish knowledge and lack of resourcefulness, Pranaitis' expert opinion is of very low value.

 

KEK!

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menahem_Mendel_Beilis

 

And this link debunks all your shill garbage:

 

http://talmud.faithweb.com/