>>4869929

>>4869948

>…sauce?

the article clearly states, "one high-ranking FBI official said…" - that's what passes for a credible journalistic source these days, haven't you heard?

I first heard this 'bombshell' story on Alex Jones show when Obama still occupied the WH…almost 2 1/2 yrs ago…yawn

>>4870228

Funny how you can go back and re-look at history and blatantly see the attempted narrative …did a little digging on Sussmann after POTUS called him out … re-read this WaPo article (link below) from the germination phase of Russia, Russia, Russia FF

"The DNC said that no financial, donor or personal information appears to have been accessed or taken, suggesting that the breach was traditional espionage, not the work of criminal hackers" – Don't spook the DNC donors or voters!

"Fancy Bear, broke into the network in late April and targeted the opposition research files… The hackers stole two files, … And they had access to the computers of the entire research staff… contained research going back years on Trump. “It’s a huge job” to dig into the dealings of somebody who has never run for office before" … Make it look like the Russians got blackmail info on Trump?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-government-hackers-penetrated-dnc-stole-opposition-research-on-trump/2016/06/14/cf006cb4-316e-11e6-8ff7-7b6c1998b7a0_story.html

>>4870485

At that point (June 2016) they were 99.99% sure (((she))) was going to win the rigged election … I believe this was just to set the narrative: Russians are the enemy (war drums), Trump is working for the Russians (voluntarily or involuntarily…so must vote for Her)