found on fakebook:

So, let me talk through a theory I just came up with. See if this makes sense on paper the way it does in my head.

I woke up the other day seeing the world lose their shit about what happened at the Lincoln Memorial. Reporters doxxing children. Celebrities calling for the heads on stakes. For some reason, this particular event seemed "off" to me. I had not seen the footage other than what was being circulated, but something told me it wasn't real. That group of kids was entirely too polite and chill. I was a high school boy once upon a time…zero chance my reaction would have been that restrained. However, the media/hollywood did what vampires do best when they smell blood; attack.

Then, almost by magic, the script flipped. The full tape was released. Witness testimonies came out. Not only did these kids not do anything wrong…they were being provoked! High powered attorneys began offering their services pro-bono for any student who wanted to file a defamation lawsuit. The vampires went into damage control. DELETE DELETE DELETE. But it was too late. Names of reporters had been cataloged. Celebrities screen-shotted. "Libel laws" came to mind. (Q even said "Libel laws, end of the MSM").

Talk about dumb luck, right?

Maybe not.

In that second, I thought back to something that Q said in the Q&A; "how are you able to predict the future?" the anon asked.

"Control," Q responded.

What if…the entire thing was a false flag, put on by the GOOD GUYS? (for those that don't know, a false flag is a staged event (although sometimes real) that is done for the sake of misdirection).

Ok. For what purpose? Why would white hats do that? For several reasons:

1. expose the MSM to the entire world as nothing more than the propaganda arm of the deep state

2. hold accountable anyone of status that wanted to destroy the lives of children, for political purposes

3. Amy Coney-Barrett

The first two bullets are obvious. But the third? How does she play a part?

I thought back to one of the last Q posts written. Q asked :

"If a woman is selected as the nominee does that eliminate the wrap up smear re: sexual assault?

What other tactics might be planned to block and/or force name removal?

Why is the Senate important?

Who controls the Senate?

53-47"

>>4870827

part 2

So by now, it should be FAIRLY obvious that Rick Ginsburg isn't coming back to work. It's hard to do that as a corpse. And I think it's the GOOD guys that are the ones keeping that information private…in order to let this final step take place. ACB is the most likely candidate to replace Rick, so it's highly unlikely that they would use the same RAPIST! tactics on her (although who the fuck knows…these people are stupid), what else would they use? She's pretty much perfect. We were all rooting for her to take over for last seat, and were shocked when he picked Kav (but in hindsight, the world needed to see the shit show that would ensue before ultimate confirmation). So what could they use? How about the exact same approach they used to prevent JFK from getting elected; separation of church and state…religion. Amy's background attending a catholic high school, university and law school were all points of contention for her confirmation to the court of appeals, despite getting elected.

So what if Q knew this was going to be their approach the entire time? How do you prevent it? By stripping the narrative before it can become a narrative. Create a scenario using a very cliche group of toxic masculinity and introduce the perfect click-bait: a peaceful Native American War hero. Release a limited view tape, that makes it appear like this was a mob on the attack. The media would not be able to control their doom boners, assuming they weren't post-op (kek). "These MAGA hat wearing, gen-z, white christian boys were racist bigots and deserved to be shot where they stood!" Until the rug was pulled out from under them.

Checkmate.

Now, you have a very recent example in which the public can draw upon to say "nope…look at what those nice Covington kids endured over there. They could have attacked that provocateur, but instead they kept their heads." Therefore, how can you paint a potential SCOTUS as being too subjugated to the church to keep a clear mind…when these kids could have demonstrated the opposite very easily? This answers the question as to why the Senate is all that matters; who makes the final confirmation call? The Senate. And why is adding another SCOTUS that important? Because it will gives the good guys a 7-2 edge on any ruling, and I BELIEVE that plays a huge part in Military Tribunals.

The nail in the coffin for me on this theory was a few tweets from POTUS. The other night, I saw the name lead kid from Covington's name for the firs time; Nick Sandman. But for some reason (and I still can't recall how) I know I've been seeing that word a lot lately; sandman. Was it a dream? Was it in the news some place? I have no clue, but it stuck out to me. Well, one tweet from POTUS yesterday, he mis-spelled the kid's name (he spelled it with one "n" (Sandman), as well as the word "judgements" (it should be judgments). I went into codefag mode, and couldn't come up with anything. Until just now.

Many of you might not know this, but today Major League Baseball announced the very first unanimous Hall of Famer; Mariano Rivera. Where did he play? The New York Yankees. Where is Trump from? New York. Why is this important? Because, Mariano Rivera…being the best closer in baseball history…would enter the game to a very recognizable song. One that would put the fear of God into opponents because he would effectively "put them to sleep." The name of that song? President Trump just tweeted it; Enter Sandman

Enter Sandman(n).

"JUDGEments"

"All Rise"

>>4870827

>>4870871

this optimist?

http://plusultrasociety.com/?fbclid=IwAR39nwldo3YGiM4kQ36ik3T_uwFH3b07G-_m3W2meL5_VpJTP0enTgL3Vo4

>>4870989

Yep. I know it well.

Q+

>>4871045

true

>>4871213

if this is all a movie…what and when is the end credits? I need off this prison planet…