Did you post lb? Or you're reposting the key info? Like the lean and mean version; good reference for searching.
notable
Went looking to see whether that tweet is somewhere in the archive. Didn't turn it up but tweets can be hard to search on, especially if the poster does not include comments but just the tweet. Anyone else know whether this has been posted?
"Wax on, wax off."
Formatting text here is quite the process. Periods disappear, five single quotes for ''bold italics'' –well, who can see each individual quote? And suppose you leave a space? Worst: leaving off one of the = that creates red text so it looks like
=this==
My search skills are not infallible, obviously. Give it a shot if you like, I could not find it. Just a million "Thanks James" postings.
Kek. I hope a Proof of Life meme campaign yields results–say, before next year.
If retweeted, how downplayed? Not sure what you are saying…the implications do seem immense.
Intrepid of you to format on a mobile. It's like going back about 30 years, pre-wysiwyg. But I tend to do complex posts so formatting is desirable. Here is your gold star for going above and beyond.
sauce?
Too far away for me. Need a DC anon (there must be some, even there).
I'm the OP for >>4872520.
I just went back and re-read the article. When the article referred to the language used to define homicide, it sounded to me like it meant the law just passed when it apparently means the law that was in place just previous to the new law. The lack of formal technical language for the new law resulted in a misinterpretation on my part.
So thank you for asking this question. It sounds like you are correct about the new law, unfortunately. Good to have a second source from which to draw.
Should probably delete >>4870790 from notables, sorry for the confusion.
Baker, can you weigh in? Sorry for the trouble.
should be "OP for >>4870790"
I am not skeptical just trying to a deeper understanding
Thanks, I guess you weren't on then. Ghost bake, and then you came. Thanks much.
I don't actually want to break their fingers and crash their networks. That is a negative prayer–what people call black magic. Kek. Want to deter them not destroy them.
Baker will issue a correction. Apologies for the mistake. Thank you for bringing to me/our attention. I'm even sorrier that this law turns out to be so much more extreme than it appeared to be.
This new law is truly alarming.You may know but the rate of abortions has hit a decade low. The trend is away from abortions. So there is hope for the future.
"Abortion rates in the United States have dropped to their lowest level in 10 years, according to a report released Wednesday by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
"From 2006 to 2015, the year of the latest completed survey , reported abortions from participating areas fell 24%, from 842,855 to 638,169."
https://www.nbc26.com/news/national/abortion-rates-in-us-reach-a-decade-low-cdc-reports (Nov 2018)
I'm not trying to minimize the various serious problems we have. But abortion is a choice.The fact that fewer women are choosing abortion is significant going forward. IMO, it reflects a shift the culture that will reap rewards over time. Especially once we are able to revamp the educational system, so children don't get brainwashed into the "sex upon demand" mindset early on. This shift is happening in spite of the schools and other negative influences.