>>4872413 lb
Found it! It was bread 6210 here >>4864711
I searched the breads because I just had to make sure I wasn’t losing my mind.
I checked all breads by scrolling through scanning pics. Started from the time of James Woods’ tweet going forward for a few breads, then went back to the one I was on last night and went backwards. I don’t usually check his twitter timeline, so I knew I had to have seen it on here.
I don’t know an easy way to set it up, but it would be nice to be able to search for pics and vids.
Lurking will help learn, but don’t be afraid to ask if you need help. Some of us do try to help newfags, and you can feel free to ignore anyone trying to make you feel bad about asking questions. They’re likely going to be disruptive shills, anyway. It also helps to use a search engine for words or phrases you don’t understand. You can usually find the definition online, and that’ll help with the Chan lingo. Q drop questions will usually get you a “re-read crumbs” reply, so be sure and do your homework. My favorite site is a qmap.pub, and you can click the heading on the drop to link to the board where it was originally posted. That will allow you to read anons replies and get more info.
Hang in there, you’ll get it.
Are you the anon that posted the C-Span video of the hearing? Is there something specific to the current timeline that we’re supposed to look at from that Mueller’s 2001 confirmation?
God Bless you, too. And we real anons really do believe WWG1WGA!
Someone posted it in the last bread and there was a conversation that it wasn’t posted before. An anon searched for “James” and couldn’t find it, and I said I thought I’d seen it, so I scrolled through breads until I found it. It’s just that without text in the post, there’s nothing for the archive search tool to find. I don’t know if there’s a solution, though.
Sorry, but I’m not falling for this sauceless document. If that were truly a statement issued by Giuliani, he’d have been smashed and wouldn’t be in the public now.