Anonymous ID: aaf4c1 Jan. 23, 2019, 9:31 a.m. No.4874779   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4874660

the ACB slide has been pushed every day for the last week

this slide falsely connects and conflates the Q post about a woman SCOTUS nominees to catholic haters and ACB

the purpose of this slide is to promote this person as nominee due to her membership in People of Pride and her antiquated views on women - need to serve and follow men she says

DS/RINO/Never Trumpers and single issue pro lifers support her

 

this is NOT a catholic smear

 

FAKE AND GAY NEWS

 

look i hate DF as much as the rest of you but this is a slide

 

she questioned ACB on People of Pride NOT catholic church

 

ACB is not really a catholic - she is an evangelical "charismatic" christian with out of the mainstream religious views EVEN for evangelicals

 

this slide is getting worse every day

 

here is what feinstein said

"your speeches demonstrate that your dogma lives loudly within you and thats a concern"

here is why she said it:

Speaking to the 2006 Notre Dame Law School graduating class, Barrett said: “Your legal career is but a means to an end, and . . . that end is building the kingdom of God. . . . [I]f you can keep in mind that your fundamental purpose in life is not to be a lawyer, but to know, love, and serve God, you truly will be a different kind of lawyer.” Admittedly, this is about lawyers and not about judges, but it speaks to her views on a legal career in general.

 

In a December 2015 piece for the University of Notre Dame Alumni Association, Barrett wrote that “[l]ife is about more than the sum of our own experiences, sorrows, and successes. It’s about the role we play in God’s ever-unfolding plan to redeem the world.” She continued: “That sounds lofty, but it’s about taking the long view. Do we see success through the eyes of our contemporaries, or through the eyes of God? Do we focus only on what God does for us, or also on what God can do for others through us.”

 

And from Catholic Judges in Capital Cases: “Judges cannot — nor should they try to — align our legal system with the Church’s moral teaching whenever the two diverge. They should, however, conform their own behavior to the Church’s standard. Perhaps their good example will have some effect.”

 

People of Praise.

 

https://peopleofpraise.org/

 

You're right that PoP is not a Catholic group. They appears to by nondenominational (they accept anyone) but with root in the Pentecostal movement. ACB is, however, a practicing Roman Catholic:

 

"Ms. Barrett told the senators that she was a faithful Catholic, and that her religious beliefs would not affect her decisions as an appellate judge."

 

https://archive.is/20170928142021/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/28/us/amy-coney-barrett-nominee-religion.html#selection-1997.0-1997.149

Anonymous ID: aaf4c1 Jan. 23, 2019, 9:37 a.m. No.4874830   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5064

>>4874737

lawfag here

i cannot sauce it but i am certain there is one or more federal laws that a prosecutor could charge for intentional deception/hiding of this information

it might have to be set up like a LEO interview but would be easy IMO

dont think thats the way its going down though

if she is unable to appear that is unsustainable for very long

Anonymous ID: aaf4c1 Jan. 23, 2019, 9:52 a.m. No.4875007   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4874946

>>4874971

nonsense

we all know what habbened

Q posted lots of false leads and dates and info to smoke out the enemy

and we all know what is going to habben

just not how and when

if you had some personal issues cuz of this you should be glad that is all you had to sacrifice