>>4877295 (pb)

Thank you, Anon. I almost never identify myself as a lawfag because we are Anons, and anonymous means anonymous. The only time one should identify oneself as a lawfag (or other type of profag), in my opinion, is when one is offering information from that professional perspective. For example, whenever I post stuff from Pacer or from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, I say, "I'm a lawfag and here's what I found….".

Other than that, I'm just an anonfag, like everyone else.

I agree with you completely that the "Lawfag Here" anon is a bloviating asshole.

Thanks again, Anon. God bless you.

>>4877698

That's excellent insight, Anon. We've possibly got a dead SCOTUS justice who won't be there, and possibly some members of Congress who won't be there because they're attending they military tribunals. So this could all be a great smokescreen..

POTUS will hold a SOTU, I'm sure. The absent Congress members will blame their absence on protests, and RBG's seat will be devoid of a drunk, passed out like a homeless bum, this year. That will lead to more pressure for proof of life, showing that the pedophile lover, RBG, is still breathing.

What a time to be alive.

God bless President Trump and Q.

#WWG1WGA

>>4877758

If only (you) knew, lawcocksucker, if only (you) knew….

>>4878153

NOTABLE suggestion for us to watch and dig