Anonymous ID: e0d564 Jan. 23, 2019, 2:23 p.m. No.4878528   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8546 >>8577 >>8709 >>8760 >>8788 >>8798 >>8875

Spitballing here… do the words LOST AT SEA mean anything as it pertains to the "wavelike" look of Trump's signature and a portion of this N/\/\/\/\/\cy Pelo/\/\/ signature?

 

Mentions her "journey"… some legal maneuvers going on here in ways 99.99% of the public is ENTIRELY blind to?

Anonymous ID: e0d564 Jan. 23, 2019, 2:27 p.m. No.4878577   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4878546

>>4878528

 

So we've got "Navy" (Admiralty Law?) in play

 

We've got an EO (executive order) that applies.

 

Does any of this have to do with the EO we got a glimpse of last year with just a few letters poking thru? And people were falsely attributing it to something else?

Anonymous ID: e0d564 Jan. 23, 2019, 2:57 p.m. No.4878976   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9001 >>9012

>>4878799

>>4878760

>>4878816

 

Something Nautical. Lost at sea. She's out to sea. Different law. Navy eee to sea…. I dunno… different language being pulled off with subtleties of the signature's strokes? Window is a port hole at sea. Flying on government airplane vs "commercial" is somehow relevant. There's a contract. Consideration of one dollar tendered. … 46 … eee…. not putting this together.

Anonymous ID: e0d564 Jan. 23, 2019, 3:03 p.m. No.4879058   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9118 >>9133

>>4878760

>>4879001

>>4879012

She's demanding that the governemt be reopened… somehow I think it's the pre-1913 government she's demanding be reopened. The one or version that's been "closed" for 100+ years? By signing as her LEGAL FICTION (ALL CAPS) is she signing for the first time in 100+ years as a rep of the house under the corporate rules? Is she demanding (under the "phony" system's laws that the "real" system be re-established???)