>>4939251

this book recycles the same shit that the book "talmud unmasked" pushed in 1898.

as written here:

>>4897090

"this link debunks all your shill garbage:

http://talmud.faithweb.com/

no wonder you are so afraid.

oh wait, what's this? all your garbage is taken from the "book" called "talmud unmasked"!

>talmud unmasked, a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861–1917).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked

The author is the same clown that was exposed as a complete fraud in the Beilis trial.

He was brought over as an "expert", and got completely exposed as a fraud:

>One prosecution witness, presented as a religious expert in Judaic rituals, was a Catholic priest, Justinas Pranaitis from Tashkent, well known for his antisemitic 1892 work Talmud Unmasked. Pranaitis testified that the murder of Yushchinsky was a religious ritual, associating the murder of Yushchinsky with the blood libel, a legend believed by many Russians at the time.

>Pranaitis' credibility rapidly evaporated when the defense demonstrated his ignorance of some simple Talmudic concepts and definitions, such as hullin,[1]:p.215 to the point where "many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer."[3]

>A Beilis Defense Committee advisor, a writer named Ben-Zion Katz, suggested countering Father Pranaitis with questions like "When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity" which he described as the equivalent of asking an American "Who lived at the Gettysburg Address?" There were enough Jews in the court for the resultant laughter to negate Pranatis' value to the prosecution.[1]:pp.214-216

KEK!

>A Tsarist secret police agent is quoted, reporting on Pranaitis' testimony, as saying: Cross-examination of Pranaitis has weakened evidentiary value of his expert opinion, exposing lack of knowledge of texts, insufficient knowledge of Jewish literature. Because of amateurish knowledge and lack of resourcefulness, Pranaitis' expert opinion is of very low value.

KEK!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menahem_Mendel_Beilis

let the shill kvetching begin!"

>>4934583

the classic shill:

<look here [jews] don't look here [our paymasters - the ruling families]

attached is relevant.

let the kvetching intensify

>>4940192

<i'll say "disinfo link" and kvetch a bit, that'll help

<oh and i'll take you meme and add "jidf" that'll ceal the deal for sure

>>4943048

>>4943031

<i'll post the walkie talkie shill meme again. It sure worked when we spammed it on qresearch

>>4944556

sockingly enough #1 you kvetch again and never address this:

>>4940013

shockingly enough #2, when victims rule is not even a book!

But an authoress internet propaganda piece.

I have q as a source. attached is relevant.

>>4943670

>>4943680

<lets kvetch some more, it will definitely work this time

<lets say anons called you a shill even if it's only our 6 shill IPs. no one will notice

the muhjew shill scripts

script #1:

the muhjew shill script:

while(1) {

print "goy, kike, moshe, schlomo, rabbi";

wait_for_reply();

if(reply == high_iq) { print "pilpul";}

elseif(reply == calling_me_a_shill) {print "jidf, what time is it in tel-aviv";}

}

>>4943680

<lets repost the walkie talkie again, this time it will do the trick

>>4945251

>>4947056

>>4945303

<shit they are on to us even here. FUCK boss!

<don't panc faggot, we got this. Lets do the standard protocol: 1. projection 2. muhjew memes. I'll post the meme and you do the projection

<10 4 boss!

>>4948722

>>4948711

<quick use the rabbi meme again and call him "mossad". don't forget to add "kike" and "cry again". And remember the protocol: projection comes first!

<got it boss. will do

<good gaylord. I'll add the muhjew meme and write jidf again. We got this faggot don't worry

>>4957604

>>4951584

>>4955476

>>4951525

>>4951485

>>4951082

<ok boss what the fuck do we do now?! he exposed our asses

<ok I got a plan faggots: use both ips, 1. spam a lot to hide the posts and bump our shill thread in the catalog. 2. post that the star of david is satanic.

<sounds awesome boss!! what else?

<post the quora link but don't post the link that debunks it:

https://www.quora.com/Why-are-some-people-saying-that-the-Star-of-David-is-the-Star-of-Moloch-or-Star-of-Remphan

<you're the gaylord boss!

<and add that instagram shill who says he is a jewish payseur as a "proof" that payseur is "jewish"! and add that the vatican is also jewish!

<but q said that it isn;t about religions and shit, last times it didn't work so well for us…

<trust me fags! it'll work this time!