>>4886548

fake quote, originating from a fake book.

this link debunks all your shill garbage:

http://talmud.faithweb.com/

no wonder you are so afraid.

oh wait, what's this? all your garbage is taken from the "book" called "talmud unmasked"!

>talmud unmasked, a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861–1917).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked

The author is the same clown that was exposed as a complete fraud in the Beilis trial.

He was brought over as an "expert", and got completely exposed as a fraud:

>One prosecution witness, presented as a religious expert in Judaic rituals, was a Catholic priest, Justinas Pranaitis from Tashkent, well known for his antisemitic 1892 work Talmud Unmasked. Pranaitis testified that the murder of Yushchinsky was a religious ritual, associating the murder of Yushchinsky with the blood libel, a legend believed by many Russians at the time.

>Pranaitis' credibility rapidly evaporated when the defense demonstrated his ignorance of some simple Talmudic concepts and definitions, such as hullin,[1]:p.215 to the point where "many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer."[3]

>A Beilis Defense Committee advisor, a writer named Ben-Zion Katz, suggested countering Father Pranaitis with questions like "When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity" which he described as the equivalent of asking an American "Who lived at the Gettysburg Address?" There were enough Jews in the court for the resultant laughter to negate Pranatis' value to the prosecution.[1]:pp.214-216

KEK!

>A Tsarist secret police agent is quoted, reporting on Pranaitis' testimony, as saying: Cross-examination of Pranaitis has weakened evidentiary value of his expert opinion, exposing lack of knowledge of texts, insufficient knowledge of Jewish literature. Because of amateurish knowledge and lack of resourcefulness, Pranaitis' expert opinion is of very low value.

KEK!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menahem_Mendel_Beilis

>>4895703

you don't even take into acount the fact that it might be a MOS clown trying to distract attention, or a soros puppet projecting.

funny how you selectively buy whatever anonymous shit that fits your agenda. Critical thinking and logical thinking are a must.

mujew is a decoy. A time tested tactic of sheep vs sheep. rulers used it throughout history.

>>4903308

again the talmud fake news.

this link debunks all your shill garbage:

http://talmud.faithweb.com/

no wonder you are so afraid.

oh wait, what's this? all your garbage is taken from the "book" called "talmud unmasked"!

>talmud unmasked, a book published in 1892 by Justinas Bonaventure Pranaitis (1861–1917).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked

The author is the same clown that was exposed as a complete fraud in the Beilis trial.

He was brought over as an "expert", and got completely exposed as a fraud:

>One prosecution witness, presented as a religious expert in Judaic rituals, was a Catholic priest, Justinas Pranaitis from Tashkent, well known for his antisemitic 1892 work Talmud Unmasked. Pranaitis testified that the murder of Yushchinsky was a religious ritual, associating the murder of Yushchinsky with the blood libel, a legend believed by many Russians at the time.

>Pranaitis' credibility rapidly evaporated when the defense demonstrated his ignorance of some simple Talmudic concepts and definitions, such as hullin,[1]:p.215 to the point where "many in the audience occasionally laughed out loud when he clearly became confused and couldn't even intelligibly answer some of the questions asked by my lawyer."[3]

>A Beilis Defense Committee advisor, a writer named Ben-Zion Katz, suggested countering Father Pranaitis with questions like "When did Baba Bathra live and what was her activity" which he described as the equivalent of asking an American "Who lived at the Gettysburg Address?" There were enough Jews in the court for the resultant laughter to negate Pranatis' value to the prosecution.[1]:pp.214-216

KEK!

>A Tsarist secret police agent is quoted, reporting on Pranaitis' testimony, as saying: Cross-examination of Pranaitis has weakened evidentiary value of his expert opinion, exposing lack of knowledge of texts, insufficient knowledge of Jewish literature. Because of amateurish knowledge and lack of resourcefulness, Pranaitis' expert opinion is of very low value.

KEK!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menahem_Mendel_Beilis

let the shill kvetching begin!

>>4904858

>>4904807

<that's not my book

<so I'll shill the lame meme again and again and again

this fake and gay book was written in 1898, your fake and gay book was baswd upon it as the alleged talmud "quotes" are the exact same ones as in the 1898 book.

kvetch harder.

>>4905124

I think this seals the deal. That anon was right, you do have an argumentation level of a 12 year old.

keep kvetching its fun to watch.

>>4905298

project harder clown.

muhjew shills are the inventors of copypasta.

kvetching intensifies.

>>4905355

this thread can be disregarded as shill op garbage.

It is another attempt to make qresearch look like stormfront for optics.

This is why the constantly bump the "jq" thread that looks like a shill shitshow, to keep it floating on top of the catalog.

This is also why they spam the main research thread in constant muhjew shill-garbage waves.

It is another attempt to create a muhjew shill hub for optics.

at this point imo it is best to let this thread die as another shill slide.

>>4905763

I agree, yet imo sometimes silence serves us better than words. we have exposed his mission completely, and his lies and hypocrisy, no more reason to give him the spotlight.

>>5074845

>>5074604