>shall
There's that word again. It has a very specific and pointed legal definition, vs May, or Can.
To me, all other debate is window dressing. He is constitution-bound to do it; Any attempts to stop him from doing his Constitutionally prescribed duty is highly unlawful, and sets a very dangerous precedent.
A 2 sec 3 specifies that it can happen when POTUS wants, who cares.
He could do the EAS and have the SOTU right now if he really felt like it ;)
>>>4883820 American Sovereignty Restoration Act (so MAGA)
kek
(sets egg timer for the screeching from afar to start)
>Well, it has been suggested here that white hats are in control of the media
Bullshit. The media is owned by he Mossad, essentially.