Just a thought … if there's an extra T in one of POTUS recent Tweets, "great" may become TARGET, as in "Over Target".

>>4883927

Kathy Griffin shows how ignorant she is with every tweet she makes.

I saw Delta [6] CONF from last bread being a NOTABLE. I presume that is referring to time between POTUS tweets.

We have others here working on presumption that deltas meant to be only be between Q and POTUS, others are looking at delta times in between POTUS Tweets.

I am not sure if one method is more valid than another, but [6] has been found quite frequently in POTUS tweets. I have been analysing tweet data for last couple months now.

The following tweets were posted [6] after the previous tweet. Refer https://qmap.pub/ for tweet contents and Tweet reference numbers.

T-4259 23 Jan

T-4112 14 Jan

T-3971 2 Jan

T-3955 31 Dec

T-3944 29 Dec

T-3869 21 Dec

T-3861 20 Dec

T-3855 20 Dec

T-3836 19 Dec

T-3815 17 Dec

And thats just in the past 6 weeks or so.

So baker not sure why this post made notables?? >>4883215

>>4884386

Thanks for the opinion but y question wasnt about the validity of the Delta method being used, but more why [6] delta found between POTUS tweets today is Notable, when its already happened 9 times over past 6 weeks.