Anonymous ID: 25d2cc Jan. 24, 2019, 2:46 a.m. No.4885796   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4885770

 

My theory is that the original invite is a form letter and was in a stack of papers to be signed as soon as the new speaker was determined. Maybe it was auto-signed.

 

Basing this on the fact that it was signed & delivered during the shutdown without the qualifier that the invite is only valid if the shutdown has ended.

 

The other mistake Pelosi made was trying to bullshit her way through the reasons for the dis-invite, without considering that she had to trash the SS and security units to do it. If she had just said, "I'm dis-inviting you because I can. BTW, fuck you" it would have been at least believable.

Anonymous ID: 25d2cc Jan. 24, 2019, 2:58 a.m. No.4885827   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5846 >>5884

>>4885791

>It seems a good sized portion of Dems may be willing to step over and take up a vote to give POTUS the funding

 

Think so, too. Maybe try to drive Pelosi so far to the left that some dems jump to indy or pub. If you force them to trot her out there to try to put lipstick on the pig enough times it may get so absurd that some will want to throw in the towel. She's becoming incoherent to the point it will become an embarrassment eventually.

Anonymous ID: 25d2cc Jan. 24, 2019, 3:07 a.m. No.4885851   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4885782

>Maybe tomorrow President Trump will blow the horn on Schumer's pirate career. Maybe Tom Fitton will sue for all Pelosi's financial records.

 

Take down her soldiers systematically. Keep doing whatever they did to get Lee to resign her committee spot yesterday under pressure. If Pelosi is repeatedly shown to not be able to protect her troops they will bail, which is better than action via outside forces, IMO.