So… Future proves past. News unlocks map. Bottom to top. Wind the clock.
Remember when we assumed Q meant the indictments/actionables were for that year? You wind the clock by going backwards from a zero to a minus (or from a positive to a zero, depending on how you look at it). First one on… Last one off.
You can't.
You are counter-dependent and can't be trusted to reason. You go off about 9/11 and rightfully lose everyone, because that movement has been compromised from the beginning.
Counter-dependent people are easy to shill to the opposite side of the conspiracy spectrum. If NASA published a report stating that the sky was blue, I could craft an argument based on physics minutia and other such things that could have the counter-dependents trying to tell their friends and family that there was a conspiracy to cover up evidence of alien farts because the sky is blue for a different reason… Or too blue… Or whatever.
Counter-dependence is still dependence, and independent people pick up on it. You don't have a rational explanation for your views. You simply have "this doesn't make sense to me so it must be wrong because government cia."
You have to start with more rational lines of inquiry. Why did ISIS suddenly fall apart after Trump cut off funding for Syria rebels? Why didn't Obama do this? What did Obama do, instead?
Who is Silsby? Why did the Clinton Foundation pay for her bail in Haiti? Why would they do this? Who is Podesta? What does his art collection look like? Would you trust your kids and family with them?
Who is Weinstein? Who is Oprah? What are OWLS? Who is Abramovic? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?