>>4915
It's a matter of altering institutional incentives for illicit profit. Too long, the institutional frameworks have been designed to artificially inflate the magnitude of profit in such things. It is in most people's opportunistic nature to make a profit, not be criminals. If the institutions are altered thoughtfully, you eliminate the forces impelling action.
That's how.
Cool your jets. Patience, young Skywalker. A lot going on. The ground is trembling, and the surface will crack open in due time.
kek
Then craft ye thy shill accounts, ready the stables of sockpuppets, prepare the lands of twatter, youtub, redditia and FB for the day. For as was foretold, the Great Meme War is at hand, and fury is upon us. The storm breaks, the foe is in disarray, and will lash out wildly in their desperation.
We know how to do this. We've all done it before. Just remember to keep opsec. DON'T LEAD THEM BACK HERE.
And yeah, shit's taking a long time to blow up. You got something better to do? Go do that.
Q is not your oracle. He's your handler. Get that through your sloping brows. Quit asking him/them to opine on shit you're obsessing about. That's not this place. That's not how this works. Discussion and speculation within the reasonable frame of the op is fine, but when you want confirmation of your pet theories, bugger off. We are working, here. If Q drops a crumb that happens to be in your specific wheelhouse, jump in and opine for all you're worth, and be prepared to defend what you say with sauce.
But don't ask Q for shit. That's not what this is about.
Feel free to make suggestions. I do. Even on things not directly related to current op, in regards to policy and strategy. But don't demand answers, don't freak out when Q doesn't validate your pet theories as "proof" of anything, and don't think that you're going to see behind all of the curtains. That's it.
Be a player, not a mark.
I think it's a good call on GEOTUS' part. The two-phase deal gets both sides what they want (amnesty, wall) up front, and leaves the details of comprehensive immigration reform to a second bill. Trump has defined the battlefield and the objectives for both sides. The continued discussion will live within this frame.
Now watch the Dems fuck it all up . . .
filtered
>>5562
You drip it to them, one drop at a time. Using facts and citations. You don't engage if they're one of the 4-5% nasty radical SJWs, but most reasonable people will be willing to have a reasonable discussion about current events. Don't come off as a hardcore MAGA, don't be uncivil or use buzzwords, and be willing to hear their fears and challenge them without dismissing them.
Small talk. With everyone you meet. You adopt that frame that you are right and they are misinformed or uninformed about the reality, and then you don't act like an ass. If they resist too much, walk away. It's not a loss, it's a process. The cumulative effect can be devastating. You speak persuasively and factually, but not insultingly, no matter how much you are tempted. Hint: don't try this with anyone who still has an "I'm With Her!" bumper sticker on their Prius.
This works. Better than cute memes or angry polemics on FB. It works because interpersonal interaction counts for something like five times more value than electronic interaction for most people.
You know where I learned it? The Obama campaign.