>>4888390 (pb)
I once told a buddy of mine urging me to get politically involved at a level requiring actually running for office that is exactly what I would do. As a public servant, with the amount of corruption, I would rig my home and office for 24/7 viewing while under term. It's a job, not a title of privacy required. News is no different. It's a public service to relay factual news and should be done so without the bias of opinion. Analysis should be left up to the viewers. No more room for secrets after this little fiasco we have all been through. Imo, you want to be a public servant, you give up any and all rights to privacy, as you now hold power over the general public in whatever form and regardless of your past, can at will exploit said power.
The tricky thing about it all is who is there to analyze when something fishy surfaces….not to mention most news agencies get all there news on a digital platform. Lots to analyze for any mainstream viewer. But something on that route is a good start towards full transparency.