>>4889302 Caves=Cuevas (in Spanish) UNITED STATES v.CUEVAS PEREZ
United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Juan Manuel CUEVAS–PEREZ, Defendant–Appellant.
No. 10–1473.
Decided: April 28, 2011
-
Before and after Knotts, individual justices have concluded in essence that the time has come, that the doctrine as implemented inadequately protects privacy in light of technological advances. E.g., Dow Chem., 476 U.S. at 240 (Powell, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (predicting that the majority's approach would “permit the gradual decay [of Fourth Amendment rights] as technology advances”); see also Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 473 (1928) (Brandeis, J., dissenting) (observing that technological innovation permits the government to learn what is “whispered in the closet” far more