Dear ConcernAnon:

Here is a verified scientific method to help you objectively discern who is winning.

1)On any given 8ch bread count up the number of Hi-IQ posts. Then count up the number of shill posts. Over time you will observe that the number of high IQ post per bread remains relatively constant (sometimes referred to as the KEK number). The number of shill posts per bread can vary dramatically.

2)Divide the KEK number by the number of shill post for the current bread, then multiply by 100 (round to the nearest tenth). This ratio is a normalized value called the Shill Index.

3)Once the Shill Index has been calculated for a specific bread, users can go to the look-up tables provided in the Global References Section and cross-reference this value with data compiled from previous breads. You will generally note that the relative magnitude of the Shill Index is inversely correlated with the qualitative measures commonly attributed to “winning.”

4)The look up tables provide links to numerous research summaries that have been prepared by well-known Anonymous researchers and institutions dedicated to the topic of winning. We are proud to report that significant data has been collected and evaluated using this technique by applying it to over 6,000 breads. However, it should be noted that the selected summaries only emphasize the qualitative Definitions,Descriptions, and Discussions (the 3D’s) of winning, and highly technical research was not included in the look up tables.

5) While the Shill Index currently remains intrinsically linked to subjective measures, the methods used for this research represent a standardized approach for evaluating winning, which is often an elusive and frustrating concept to pin down. It is hoped that this approach will someday provide the basis for a more robust empirical methodology that can be statistically validated, and therefore, ultimately enhance our understanding of what “real-world winning” really means.

Sincerely,

FurloughedFederalWorkerAnon