Anonymous ID: 730767 Jan. 24, 2019, 2:40 p.m. No.4892137   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2274

http://beverlytran.blogspot.com/2018/02/perkins-coies-sec-money-laundering.html#axzz5dZCiDhku

 

trust fund money laundering

 

To begin, allow me to refresh the memories of our readers:

 

#perkinscoiesucks

 

Now, that we have that out of the way, the Securities and Exchange Commission has released its most recent report on the Perkins Coie Trust Fund, but do you still wonder why Perkins Coie Sucks?

 

Image result for paying someone to steal

I never include the "g".

Well, there is this thing in the U.S. Constitution called the Emoluments Clause.

 

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatsoever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.

 

There is also this thing called the Hatch Act.

 

The Hatch Act of 1939, officially An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law whose main provision prohibits in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president, vice-president, and certain designated high-level officials

[1] from engaging in some forms of political activity. It went into law on August 2, 1939.

 

In essence, these two mechanisms are to prevent individuals who formally hold officies, including their spouses, not to take bribes or use information gained from their positions for personal inurement.

 

TRANSLATION: STOP STEALIN' FROM THE NATIONAL TREASURY!!!

 

Well, it seems Perkins Coie has found a loophole for, not just Members of Congress, but for the Democratic National Committee Members.

 

See, the scam works like this:

 

"The Elected Ones" pump out propaganda to push through legislation to fund their fraud schemes like TARP.

 

Once the funding is appropriated to unincorporated fraud schemes like Detroit Land Bank Authority, which "The Legal Genuises" (trademark pending) of Perkins Coie set up, they turn around and get paid in creative attorney fees, then invest in their Trust Funds.

 

The Perkins Coie Trust Funds are a special breed of trust funds because they fall under employee trusts, which has not been amended for quite some time.

 

I previously covered this because trust fund laws are arcane and were created as part of the peculiar institution.

 

Anyway, since a Member of Congress is not supposed to engage in personal inurement of office, there is nothing that says they are prohibited from creating trust funds which will substantially benefit from legislation or propaganda policies a Member promulgates.

 

For instance, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Debbie Wasserman Schultz or John Podesta, DNC head honchos, tell Perkins Coie, attorney-client privilege, that there is a big money scheme they set up, ready to be grabbed, like the Detroit Land Bank Authority.

 

Then, they "pay consultation fees" to Perkins Coie for setting it up through fees paid through the campaigns, where the TARP money they ripped off was funneled through NGOs like, perhaps, just saying, not really sure, just off the top of my head, the Clinton Foundation, or by whatever flavor of the week they call themselves.

 

Then, Perkins Coie hedges through their Trust Fund that, more than likely, these public officials through their trust funds, are all connected because a trust fund is separate and distinct from the person, or, in this instance, the public official, and their spouses.

 

cont-

Anonymous ID: 730767 Jan. 24, 2019, 2:50 p.m. No.4892274   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2400

>>4892137

 

As you will see, below, I took my top SEC Perkins Coie picks of investments, which are the antithesis of the entire Democratic Party platform.

 

Seriously.

 

You have pharmaceutical corporations that have been hit with massive civil fines for fraud, but still ended up churning out a profit because it is cheaper to pay the regulatory fine than for the DOJ or SEC to actually do their jobs.

 

Then they contribute the ill gotten gains to political campaigns.

 

You will find all the social media companies that were "allegedgly" not hacked like Facebook, Yahoo and Twitter, to throw the 2018 Presidential General Election.

 

Salesforce is one of Pelosi's pets and her trust fund is in her her husband's name, (That is another tale. Hold on.)

 

Then, there are lots of privatized military contractors, which means if Perkins Coie does not help its clients, who just so happen to be Democratic Members of Congress, to push the U.S. into more fake wars, everyone will lose money.

 

The same scenario applies to health care, which is probably why Perkins Coie Trust cut some of its health care holdings.

 

In short, Perkins Coie Trust is a money laundering operation for the DNC, Clinton Foundation and Detroit Land Bank Authority, and, considering the fact that it is a trust, and trusts fall under the scope of the Emoluments Clause, and considering the fact that the Attorney General Sessions has ramped up asset forfeitures in criminal activities, well, guess what, trust funds fall right up under this category, quite nicely.

 

Learn more: BEVERLY TRAN: Perkins Coie's SEC Money Laundering Trust Fund Emolument Fraud Scheme

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

AT&T INC

ABBOTT LABS

BANK OF AMERICA CORP

BANK OF AMERICA CORP

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC

BLACKROCK INC

CELGENE CORP

ENBRIDGE INC.

EXXON MOBIL CORP

FACEBOOK INC

INTEL CORP

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO

LAS VEGAS SANDS

LILLY ELI & CO

LIONS GATE ENTERTAINMENT

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

MERCK & CO INC

MICROSOFT CORP

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP

NOVARTIS AG

PFIZER INC

POTLATCH CORPORATION

QUALCOMM INC

SALESFORCE.COM INC

SEATTLE GENETICS

TWITTER INC

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC

UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC

VANGUARD

WAL-MART STORES INC

ZILLOW GROUP INC

 

Voting is beautiful, be beautiful ~ vote.©

Posted by Beverly Tran at 4:27:00 PM

Labels: asset forfeiture, Child welfare, Clinton Foundation, Detroit Land Bank Authority, DNC, DOJ, emoluments, FBI, fraud, human trafficking, John Conyers, John Podesta, Nancy Pelosi, Perkins Coie, SEC, Trust Funds

 

Learn more: BEVERLY TRAN: Perkins Coie's SEC Money Laundering Trust Fund Emolument Fraud Scheme http://beverlytran.blogspot.com/2018/02/perkins-coies-sec-money-laundering.html#ixzz5dZH6jfid

Stop Medicaid Fraud in Child Welfare

Anonymous ID: 730767 Jan. 24, 2019, 3:01 p.m. No.4892400   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4892274

salesforce paul pelosi

 

https://freebeacon.com/issues/pelosis-husband-invested-solar-firm-weeks-lucrative-expansion/

 

Pelosi’s Husband Invested in Solar Firm Weeks Before Lucrative Expansion

SunEdison is now eyeing bankruptcy, but Paul Pelosi invested right before a 2014 stock rally

SHARE

TWEET

EMAIL

Nancy Pelosi, Paul PelosiHouse Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of Calif., and her husband, Paul, arrive for a state dinner / AP

BY: Lachlan Markay Follow @lachlan

April 19, 2016 11:15 am

 

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi’s husband bought up to a quarter million dollars of stock in a now financially troubled green energy company just weeks before it announced a major 2014 acquisition that sent stock prices soaring, public records show.

 

SunEdison told regulators last week that it is eyeing bankruptcy under the weight of $11.7 million in debt. But in late 2014, investors were bullish on the company, which manufactures and operates solar and wind power facilities.

 

Its 2014 purchase of wind energy company First Wind "further bolstered the reputation of the company," wrote one market-watcher at the time. "Perhaps unsurprisingly, SunEdison's stock soared an astounding 29% on news of this acquisition alone."

 

Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, had invested just in time. He bought between $100,000 and $250,000 in SunEdison stock on Oct. 24, 2014, according to congressional financial disclosures. The company announced its First Wind acquisition on Nov. 17.

 

Pelosi’s office did not respond to questions about the timing of the purchase and whether she or her husband had any advance knowledge of the deal.

 

Pelosi has previously been accused of trading stock based on information gleaned through her official duties. She participated in Visa’s initial public offering as the company fought a House bill to subject credit card companies to increased regulation. The measure failed to pass.

 

A law passed in the wake of that controversy prohibits members of Congress from using nonpublic information for personal gain. Language in that measure was informally dubbed the "Pelosi Provision."

 

In addition to her stock trades, Pelosi steered more than $1 billion in federal subsidies to a light rail project that likely improved the value of the San Francisco headquarters of cloud computing company Salesforce, in which her husband had invested up to $1 million.

 

Paul Pelosi’s stake in SunEdison will likely force the wealthy investor to take a haircut if the company declares bankruptcy. SunEdison’s First Wind acquisition turned out to be a significant part of a larger expansion over the last two years that left the company with unsustainable levels of debt.