Perkins Coie Wins Reversal of Conviction of Osama bin Laden’s Driver, Salim Hamdan
10.16.2012 | PRESS RELEASES
D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Vacates 2008 Guantanamo Bay Military Commission Conviction
WASHINGTON, D.C. – (October 16, 2012) The Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit today reversed and vacated the conviction of Salim Ahmed Hamdan for material support for terrorism. Mr. Hamdan was a driver for Osama bin Laden. He was tried in a Military Commission in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Although the military jury acquitted him of conspiracy, it convicted him of material support for terrorism, a crime created by act of Congress in the Military Commissions Act of 2006, 10 U.S.C. § 948a et seq. But Mr. Hamdan’s conduct occurred in 1996 to 2001, well before the Military Commissions Act was enacted. The D.C. Circuit ruled that the Military Commissions Act should not be construed to apply retroactively, because doing so would implicate the U.S. Constitution’s prohibition on Ex Post Facto laws. Regardless of the status of the defendant, the Constitution prohibits Congress from passing a criminal law that is Ex Post Facto. U.S. Const. art. I, section 9. The Court’s decision recognizes this is a bedrock principle of the American rule of law that applies in times of perceived emergency as well as times of peace. The Court also considered whether the Military Commission had the power to try Mr. Hamdan for material support for terrorism under other authority, 10 U.S.C. § 821, that predated the Military Commissions Act. The Court concluded that the Military Commission did not because as the Government conceded, material support for terrorism—unlike the crime of terrorism itself—was not and is not a violation of the international law of war, which is a necessary predicate for trial by Military Commission.
Perkins Coie, joined by appointed military counsel and at times civilian co-counsel, represented Mr. Hamdan at all stages of this matter. Joseph M. McMillan argued the case to the D.C. Circuit.