>>4894024

I don't think we're subject to SEC laws bc we are anonymous. Even if someone claims to have expertise/knowledge, the premise of the site is that we have no way of knowing whether that's true, therefore assume no authority. 8ch/qresearch is no more liable for advice given here by anons than a cafe is liable for advice one random dude gives to another on their premises.

However

I do believe that we should be extremely conservative re: putting any advice to purchase/use a product in notables. It seems vulnerable to the kind of abuse we'd be better off avoiding. We're here to dig on the crimes of the cabal, that should be the focus of notables IMO.

>>4893990

>Amish Walky Talky = Fungal Leaf

Kek, not Amish, Orthodox Jew.

Possible.

It will feed his sad tranny ballerina ego, but I have to concede zher does have a sense of humor.

On the other hand, Walkie Talkie Jew poster's content and humor seems pretty consistent with genuine JQ-woke anons. Is fungus smart enough to mimic? Probably. Would he and his handlers want it mimicked so well? Not sure.

BO/BV know a lot of zher's IP hashes, they might know. But they're pretty conservative on posting hashes in general – needs to be pretty blatant, repetitious spam. That's for anons to figure out. Mods aren't here to be our babysitters, just protect free speech and address technical needfuls.

>>4894486

>it's a tired argument that they keep trying to force.

Agreed, just wanted to reiterate the conditions/protections of our platform re: this issue but as applied to many related issues (including medical advice), for newfags/concernfags.

>The only time these are mentioned is by volume, trends or if they merit it based on overall performance.

Yes, this is clearly shown in the post these bitches are kvetching about. Again, was just taking the opportunity to clarify our standards. Even your reply helps distinguish for possible future debates the difference between general info of interest (i.e. market trends) vs. promotion of a product. That was my intention. You know how these shills are, their handlers instruct them to shit test for weaknesses in order to strategize future offensives. Part of what I try to do for the board is to anticipate those and shore up defined, objective standards around areas of potential confusion/dissension.