Funny, anon. True. But I think this shill post has gotten more anons curious about why they're after Wilcock. After awhile, you ask, "Why are the shills making such a big deal about Joe Schmoe?" Backfires.
Have been following your argument against notablizing financial advice. Don't know the answer to this question. Best place to take that is BO, let him resolve once and for all and post whether he sees this as a problem or not.
Whether market forecasts belong in Notables as info we need for our work is a different issue about which anons can debate.
Very articulate explanation, would tentatively recommend Notable if other anons find equally useful.
Do not agree there was nothing of note in notables today–or any day. What kind of perfection are you seeking? Absolutist statements like this make us think the writer is a shill (not about high standards).
No, get all the ladies anyway. They know the value of politesse.
It's always hard to tell the difference between real grievances and those engineered to look real but ring hollow on some level. I thought it was funny to have someone attack because I was overly polite. I'm not always so polite! KEK.
>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/24/timeline-how-the-covington-hate-hoax-spread-on-social-media-and-who-blew-up-the-misleading-video/