>>4894742 lb

>BVs and Bakers endorse JQ shitposts

Untrue. This has been addressed many times. BO/BV support free speech. Period. If ever they take up a position re: content it is to address either demands of censorship, or blatant repetitive spam, and they have posted hash histories of spambots on both the pro- and anti-JQ side of Team Shill. They do not endorse or condemn any subject matter and to factual contributions. It is fully in the realm of Anons' choice what to post and nominate/de-nominate, and baker's discretion what to put in notables. If it appears they have addressed "anons" crying for censorship surrounding info on Jews and Israel more often than anons crying for censorship on other topics, it is only because of the actual relative volume of "shut it down!" kvetching on those topics.

Bakers are also equal opportunity truth-seekers and cabal-outers. It doesn't matter their religion or background, posts re: criminal fuggery that's relevant to our movement is always noted if it's sauced and factually accurate. Point to me the last time you saw a rash of "that's disinfo don't notable that!" posts in relation to Catholic priests molesting kids or some WASP congressman on the take? Whereas everyone here knows it's a daily occurrence re: Jews and Israel. Much goyim. So knowing.

>>4895136

>Absolutist statements like this make us think the writer is a shill (not about high standards).

Yup. The biggest tell-tale sign in this shill's case is the high volume, multi-bread, insistent drama-posting. But there's a lot of shaming in there, too, first of accusing of us Anons of not living up to something we identify with and take pride in: being effective researchers. Leftists like attacking your sense of self, your confidence.

Our being Anon protects us overall from their favorite attack style, the named, targeted attack. But they use what they can with the only Alinsky-style-targetable "persons" we have: BO/BVs & bakers:

>BO will do nothing.

>Not his job nor does he care (perhaps).

>It is Baker's job to not allow this bullshit to be in Notables.

Attributing pathological motives to accused wrong-doing is also typical of leftist shills. Notice how he implies that BO's content-neutral approach is "not caring" rather than caring enough about protecting our principle of free speech that he has the discipline to leave his personal opinion out of it – hardly the default in human interactions.

>>4895084

Thanks anon. The same shill pushing the above continues to use the pathologizing/shaming techniques on you just for supporting a reasoned dismissal of his bs

>>4895143

>I bet you get all the ladies, but only after you get tentatively get approval from everybody else.

Deliberately misconstruing being humble, collegial and gentlemanly with being weak due to an inherent biological deficiency, then stigmatizing the accusation with the inevitable worst end to the accompanying fear of being lonely, unwanted.

It's so easy to see thru these pigs. But most of us aren't born seeing it. They can fuck with our heads awhile IRL until we do. When justice comes, I hope they get all the pain they deserve.