>>490154

At the VERY BEGINNING, when all of this Q stuff started last year on halfchan, Q or someone else mentioned (Anyone else remember operator anon?) that taking down openly anonymous sites like chans and others, was a black flag type event- critical mission failure, [effective and anonymous] freedom of speech made much extremely difficult by the black groups we're fighting.

> The Clock is ticking

> Fight Fight Fight

Is that it? All or nothing- Patriots win, corruption revealed, true government restored; or 1776 commences. How much time do we have exactly?

>>490439

We lose 4/8ch, load rifles, active resistance is another level beyond that, as cliche'd as the saying is; "You will know when it is time"

Anyway sites getting shut down for 'human trafficking' but in reality just being gathering places for conservative / alternate/ unpopular viewpoints would be inevitable. Look at the cesspool that is public facebook posts on anything considered controversial, now imagine thats the entirety of the new 'internet'.

They don't know what hornets nest their poking.

>>490457

It's a liddle too perfect imo, notice no one touched it in committee for nearly a year, and suddenly it's on the table for a vote, and gives the perfect tools to take down any site quietly, and any complaints hand waved away as being 'for the children' and human trafficking. Even Reddit should be up in arms over this, yet nothing.