Stanley Plotkin, Godfather of vaccines, UNDER OATH! - Part 1/9
PART 1
How a pro-vaccine doctor reopened debate about link to autism
A world-renowned pro-vaccine medical expert is the newest voice adding to the body of evidence suggesting that vaccines can cause autism in certain susceptible children.
Pediatric neurologist Dr. Andrew Zimmerman originally served as the expert medical witness for the government, which defends vaccines in federal vaccine court. He had testified that vaccines do not cause autism in specific patients.
Dr. Zimmerman now has signed a bombshell sworn affidavit. He says that, during a group of 5,000 vaccine-autism cases being heard in court on June 15, 2007, he took aside the Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers he worked for defending vaccines and told them heâd discovered âexceptions in which vaccinations could cause autism.â
âI explained that in a subset of children, vaccine-induced fever and immune stimulation did cause regressive brain disease with features of autism spectrum disorder,â Dr. Zimmerman now states. He said his opinion was based on âscientific advancesâ as well as his own experience with patients.
For the government and vaccine industryâs own pro-vaccine expert to have this scientific opinion stood to change everything about the vaccine-autism debate â if people were to find out.
But they didnât.
Dr. Zimmerman goes on to say that once the DOJ lawyers learned of his position, they quickly fired him as an expert witness and kept his opinion secret from other parents and the rest of the public.
Whatâs worse, he says the DOJ went on to misrepresent his opinion in federal vaccine court to continue to debunk vaccine-autism claims.
Records show that on June 18, 2007, a DOJ attorney to whom Dr. Zimmerman spoke told the vaccine court: âWe know [Dr. Zimmermanâs] views on the issue. ⌠There is no scientific basis for a connectionâ between vaccines and autism.
Dr. Zimmerman now calls that âhighly misleadingâ and says heâd told them the opposite.
Vaccine safety advocate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., of Childrenâs Health Defense, describes the DOJ attorneysâ alleged cover-up and misrepresentations as âone of the most consequential frauds, arguably in human history.â He has filed a fraud complaint with the DOJ inspector general against the DOJ attorneys involved. (The inspector generalâs office said it cannot comment on investigations or potential investigations.)
As a backdrop, it helps to understand how vaccine injury claims are handled in the United States.
Congress created the special vaccine court in 1988, in consultation with the pharmaceutical industry. In this special court, hearings are private and vaccine makers donât defend their products â the federal government does it for them, using DOJ lawyers. Money for victims comes from us, not from the pharmaceutical industry, through patient fees added to every vaccine given.
Rolf Hazlehurst is the parent of one autistic child whom Dr. Zimmerman states got autism from vaccination. A criminal prosecutor, Hazlehurst told congressional staffers at a briefing in 2013 that âif I did to a criminal in a court of law what the United States Department of Justice did to vaccine-injured children, I would be disbarred and I would be facing criminal charges. I think that scared the hell out of them.â An upcoming House Oversight hearing on the topic was abruptly cancelled.
Dr. Zimmermanâs opinion mirrors that of another pro-vaccine medical expert â the late Dr. Bernadine Healy, former director of the National Institutes of Health. And it lines up with what the head of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Immunization Safety, Dr. Frank DeStefano, told me in 2014. When asked about vaccines triggering autism in certain susceptible children, DeStefano acknowledged it as possible.
âI guess that, that is a possibility,â said DeStefano. âItâs hard to predict who those children might be, but certainly, individual cases can be studied to look at those possibilities.â
No known studies have been attempted. However, vaccine court cases show that some children whose autism was triggered by vaccine had unknown pre-existing susceptibilities including Tuberous Scleroris (TS) and mitochondrial disorder. The U.S. vaccine court has paid $4 billion to date, including for injuries in which children ended up with autism but when the plaintiffâs alleged the brain injury using the term âencephalopathyâ rather than âautism.â
cont. in part 2
PART 2
How a pro-vaccine doctor reopened debate about link to autism
When asked, the DOJ, the CDC and the pharmaceutical lobby group PhRMA had no comment about Dr. Zimmermanâs affidavit. The primary attorney named in Dr. Zimmermanâs affidavit as having misrepresenting his opinion no longer works for the Justice Department, and did not answer repeated requests for comment for a recent âFull Measureâ program on the controversy.
The CDC website currently makes no mention of Dr. Zimmermanâs opinion, his published findings or similar studies, or numerous cases in which the government has paid damages in vaccine court to children who â according to the vaccine court and medical experts â got autism as a result of their vaccine injuries. The CDC states unequivocally that âvaccines do not cause autism.â
Scientists say itâs entirely possible to identify conditions most likely to make children susceptible to vaccine injury and to devise a safer vaccination policy to protect them, while continuing a robust vaccine program for the rest.
For the sake of children, Congress should re-examine both sides of the medical science in this case.
Sharyl Attkisson is an Emmy Award-winning investigative journalist, author of The New York Times best-sellers "The Smear" and "Stonewalled," and host of Sinclair's Sunday TV program, âFull Measure.â Follow her on Twitter @SharylAttkisson
https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/425061-how-a-pro-vaccine-doctor-reopened-debate-about-link-to-autism
PART 1
MD: Iâve seen cases of vaccine injury for 40 years
Australian doctor exposes vaccine damage, stands up to government/media attacks
Here is what he wrote
by Jon Rappoport
September 4, 2017
In Australia, the noose is tightening around parentsâ and childrenâs necks.
There is already a policy in place that denies certain government benefits to families who donât vaccinate their kids. Now, there is legislation that would deny unvaccinated children enrollment in daycare and kindergarten.
But a grassroots rebellion is underway.
Australian MD John Piesse has stepped out of the shadows and reported his findings and research on vaccine damage. The government is investigating him. They may strip his license. The press is attacking him mercilessly.
He isnât backing down.
His stance is certainly heroic, but remember that every doctor takes an oath to do no harm to his patients. Without question, there are many other doctors who know the truth, first-hand, about what vaccines really do. But they stay silent.
Some of these doctors donât vaccinate their own childrenâŚbut they continue to inject toxic chemicals and viruses into their young patients. That is a crime and betrayal of the first order.
Here, in full, is a letter Dr. Piesse recently wrote to The Age. Read it. Study it. Understand it. This isnât the unhinged raving of a madman, as the press would have you believe.
This is basic truth that every parent should have and own:
âI have been encountering cases of vaccine injury for over 40 years. In June it was a happy, healthy nearly 5-year-old whose parents were required to put her on a catch-up schedule, in order to get her into kindergarten. She wonât be going to kinder. Sheâs in a wheel-chair, brain-damaged. Her life ruined. Then came a friendâs father who died after a flu vaccine, and last week a 4 year old boy, made autistic by a catch-up schedule.â
âIn 1988, the US National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was created. It has paid out over US$3.5 billion to the vaccine-injured. The NVICP was set up to protect vaccine manufacturers from ruinous costs of litigation by vaccine-damaged people. It was deemed preferable to have âunavoidably unsafeâ vaccines than no vaccines. Unfortunately the protection provided to vaccine manufacturers also reduced incentives to develop safer vaccines in USA.â
âVaccines contain health-damaging ingredients, not the least aluminium â a known neurotoxin implicated along with mercury, in brain damage as in autism, developmental delay, ADHD, and learning difficulties. Aluminium is also a powerful promoter of auto-immune diseases. Vaccines can claim to be mercury-free if their mercury content is below a still-toxic threshold. Most influenza vaccines contain mercury â also a neurotoxin. In addition, polysorbate 80 in vaccines increases the permeability of the blood brain barrier and potentiates the risks of these neurotoxins. The known presence of carcinogenic viruses in the MMR vaccine, has been covered-up. Vaccines also contain formaldehyde, a known carcinogen.â
âProof of vaccine safety requires rigorously conducted clinical studies comparing vaccinated versus truly unvaccinated children for health outcomes. Are there any such studies that confirm that vaccinated children are not worse-off than those unvaccinated? No. There are none. Hence, child vaccines are unproven for safety â an inconvenient truth for a profession that prides itself on being scientific.â
âŚcont. in part 2
PART 2
MD: Iâve seen cases of vaccine injury for 40 years
âOne analysis indicated that national infant mortality rates were proportional to the number of vaccine doses (Miller NZ 2011), contradictory to the claim that âvaccination saves livesâ.â
âFrom mid-2015, parents who wished not to vaccinate their children, started to converge on my practice seeking assistance with gaining exemption from the penalties directed at non-vaccinators by the No Jab No Pay and No Jab No Play Legislation.â
âAnalysis up to the end of 2016 of parentâs reasons for not vaccinating, indicated that 64% of 166 parents knew of vaccine-damaged individuals in their own family. The study of âAdversomicsâ confirms polymorphic and genomic susceptibility factors common to vaccineâdamaged individuals and their families. (Poland GA 2015). 40% of unvaccinated children had pre-existing health problems that parents considered would make them more at risk of harm from vaccines. 60% of unvaccinated children were very healthy, but only 6% of the vaccinated children. There were no cases of autism in 212 unvaccinated children, but 8 autism cases in the 50 vaccinated children (16%), and 36% with ASD [autism spectrum disorder], compared to 1.4% in the unvaccinated.â
âAs yet there are no large-scale vaccinated versus truly unvaccinated studies of the sort needed prove that vaccines do or do not cause autism.â
âSo where does the widespread belief that vaccines do not cause autism derive? In a nutshell: from an over-whelming quantity of âmanufactured scienceâ of low quality, scientific fraud, and ignoring evidence supporting causality. Few doctors and politicians are aware of the pivotal scientific fraud committed in the US Centers for Disease Control. A study of the MMR vaccine in black American babies showed a 2.5 fold higher level of autism in babies given the MMR vaccine at 12 months of age compared to 3 years. The CDC refused to publish these findings but manipulated the data to disguise the undeniable association found. The fraudulent data was then published (DeStefano F 2004 ) and promoted as the final statement on the question. Thereafter the official line was that vaccination did not cause autism. 5000 vaccine-damaged children had their applications in the Vaccine Court for compensation quashed after this deception. But [CDC] whistle-blower William Thompson released the true unabridged data which was published briefly until pressure from the CDC forced its retraction (Hooker B 2014)â
âA recent study of home-school students showed a 6.6 fold increase in neurodevelopmental disorders in the vaccinated group over the unvaccinated. Autism spectrum disorders were 4.7 times more prevalent in the vaccinated children (Mawson AR 2017).â
âSo long as doctors and governments continue to be hood-winked into believing that vaccines do not cause autism, no action will be taken to stop the alarming surge in the autism epidemic. A tragedy that need not happen if we demand good science and safe vaccines.â
Who is next?
Who is the next doctor to step into the light and tell the truth, regardless of the consequences?
âWhether âtis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take Arms against a Sea of troubles,
And by opposing end themâŚâ
In this case, âArmsâ means the truth. Because if it spreads far enough, from many doctors, there will be an end to the high mounds of intentional lies that compose official science, which is fake scienceâdesigned to put children under the gun, under the needle.
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/09/04/md-ive-seen-cases-of-vaccine-injury-for-40-years/
Lethal Injection: The Story Of Vaccination
Silent Epidemic; The Untold Story of Vaccines Movie dire