>>4900664
Q could have said, day 1, that Huma and Podesta would be arrested, EVENTUALLY.
Q did not.
Q said that the arrests were right around the corner, and he was flat wrong.
I've seen that justification (in pink) many times before.
Q could have simply told the truth from the beginning.
You did not answer my question. And the pink boilerplate justification was not on point.
I was not asking why the arrests weren't happening right away.
I was asking what the point of Q clock numerology was?
This is not the first time I've seen conspiracy research boards, when things don't happen the way they say, resort to bizarre after the fact justifications.
The question again: what home runs has Q clock hit?
In other words 1) Q says something 2) it doesn't happen 3) Q clock is applied, and then, the all important 4) the thing happens in accordance with the Q clock.
Tell me about the 4s that have happened? It appears to be just random garbage for people who have never seen how people generally "solve" broken conspiracy theories.
Unless you can give me a bunch of 4) - Q clock accurately provides timing for old Q statements.