Anonymous ID: 68dae5 Jan. 25, 2019, 10:31 a.m. No.4902972   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3028

>>4902799

 

if the Q post precedes POTUS public twatter posts/statements, etc, that can fairly be called a proof or at least points in favor of a proof.

The other way around, POTUS public tweet preceding a Q post, isn't much of a proof, as that can easily be written off as someone just copying verbiage from POTUS old tweets.