So if POTUS signs this, he essentially scares CM into shutting 8chan down, effectively putting Q out of business. Do I have that right?
If POTUS does not veto this, then what does that say about his support for Q and anons efforts?
>What if shutting down the chanz is literally the plan?
Interesting thought. That could very well be the plan. It seems like it comes with huge 1A abrogations, and it would be sad to see the chanz go, but if it was required for good to defeat evil, then so be it.
>But then how would each one of us access stuff that we don't have but others do?
Anons will find a way.
>>490154
It would seem this legislation would be ripe for abuse of civil liability lawsuits that social media giants would be all to happy to see weaponized against their less-censored, less legally-prepared competition. It would only take a couple of clowns to start that kind of trouble.
If this has bi-partisan support in congress, and it's poisoned with provisions (pic-related) that will make it politically difficult for POTUS to veto, then what is the angle here that convinces congressmen to vote against it as written? Can it be fixed in a way that wouldn't expose the chanz to liability?