>>490154

Section in bill is poorly worded. That vulnerability exists.

All hosts would be liable and prosecutors could pick and choose winners and losers.

So the [3] on twitter revealed hours later by JA's twitter: Cernovic, Posobeic, Loomer censored.

It was Stone before.

Now it's AJ

Who's next?

Drudge?

...

...

Chans>8chan? Therefore QClearance?

Counter should be focused on poor wording/vulnerability of bill and not slide into emotional argument i.e: "you DO love the children right?" "You don't hate sex-victims DO you?"

(...)

@Anons

So you may not like some of the reporters mentioned. But it's supposed to be:

"Where we go one, we go all."

This censorship garbage is a battle of erosion. We must reinforce the walls against tyranny every generation, every single day.

_X

>>490870

Peterson puts it well: "you have a right to freespeach." 'You do Not have a right to being comfortable. The outcome of freedom of speech is that you will necessarily offend and can be offended'

The sharing of ideas requires this exchange.

TYAnon_X

>>490919

I think he meant simply that

THE PEOPLE

Own it. [Us]

He goes on to say we were chosen for a reason. I like to think one of those reasons is that it is a

Public Anonymous Forum

Everyone and … specific [any]one's are free to infer/'decode' what they will. Clever. No private comms needed so no private comms to be intercepted.

I also believe there is a sincere meaning to "we the people" should know the truth by Q. And that this will come 40/60 and after some time more. It's classy and done with care.

Some people are frustrated with the DOJ. I see the as being meticulous.

In chess you don't 'kill' the king. You exhaust the enemy's means of escape. Sometimes the opponent sees it coming and forfeits. Our enemy doesn't see this or is impudent holding the world hostage with say NK and compromised people's.

Remember LV?

Witnesses murdered? Paddock T.O.D.

Silence won't last forever-Q

I had wondered that to anon. This place is ours._X