>>4911016 lb
we know that payseur is the chair. the question is the chair of what master (the chair serves the master). I thought the master is the notion of satan, but it could be that the master is a core of select families, around whom the cult is constructed, with roths being the cult leaders (the cult of these families + satan).
originally it referred to anti jew obsessed socially engineered morons.
Today it became washed up unfortunately, thanks to the sjw reform "jews".
he sounds like a useful idiot.
shulamit alony was an israeli soros puppet, in the radical left Meretz party:
http://progressiveisrael.org/2010/10/page/2/
the attack was done by palestinian prisoners (convicted militia men and terrorists) after the israeli prison authorities conducted searches in the cells. The response was by the israeli anti prison riot swat team:
https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/193837-190124-palestinian-prisoners-on-hunger-strike-following-ofer-prison-riot
https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/international/middle-east/193892-190124-israeli-palestinian-authorities-reach-agreement-after-violent-ofer-prison-riot
he is talking about the Arab slave trade, you retard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_trade
<all the boats!
<it must be true cause a shill said so
<kike goy kike
sure thing moron.
Never go full retarded, not even when shilling.
the muhjew shill script
while(1) {print "kike goy moshe schlomo rabbi"
if (reply == 'high_iq") {print "pilpul"}
if (reply == "call_out_the_shills"} {print "jidf"}
}
bullshit shill garbage.
>Did Jews dominate the slave trade?
>Not according to scholars that have closely examined the question. Several studies of the Jewish role in the slave trade were conducted in the 1990s. One of them, by John Jay’s Faber, compared available data on Jewish slave ownership and trading activity in British territories in the 18th century to that of the wider population. Faber concludes that the claim of Jewish domination is false and that the Jewish role in slavery was “exceedingly limited.” According to Faber, British Jews were always in the minority of investors in slaving operations and were not known to have been among the primary owners of slave fleets. Faber found that, with few exceptions, Jews were minor figures in brokering the sale of slaves upon their arrival in the Americas, and given the urban-dwelling propensity of most American Jews, few accumulated large rural properties and plantations where slave labor was most concentrated. According to Faber, Jews were more likely than non-Jews to own slaves, but on average they owned fewer of them.
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-the-african-slave-trade/
>Overall, though, the conclusions Korn drew from his data were very different: he made a strong and persuasive case that there were few Jews in the planting class in the South, that Jews had historically been forced into commercial enterprises, that in the Old South they were typically city dwellers, that a small number participated in the domestic slave trade, that they treated their slaves no better or worse than other slaveholders, and that the few Jews in the South without exception endorsed slavery. The thrust of Korn's article was that Jews were not much different from other white southerners in their views on race and slavery.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1995/09/slavery-and-the-jews/376462/
hey look! its the spambot again!
below is a complete spambot analysis:
a shill chatbot analysis - including relevant q posts V2.0
V1.0 of the research:
>>4346883 pb
look at the attached q posts.
The highlighted text explains the behavior of the spam chatbots that are constantly deployed here.
my experiment is described here:
here i trolled the spam chatbot with a reply:
>>4345440 pb
and what do you know?
it gave me an automatically generated text pasta reply:
>>4345586 pb
and posted another 4 posts with a random delta that is in the range [10-30 minutes]:
>>4345586 pb
>>4345666 pb
>>4345825 pb
>>4345962 pb
exactly as q told us more than a year ago!
What they did manage to do during this year is to update their automatic post pattern to be triggered by a reply. Notice that the bot posts a first "common drive post", like q called it, and the subsequent 4 posts will all tap into this one.
To summarize, lets get back to the q post.
similarly to what is written in the q post, the spambot uses a 5 prong pre packaged injection, only this time it has a precursor post serving as bait. After an anon takes the bait and replies, the bot searches for "negative" keywords ("bot", "r2d2", "spam", "shill", etc). If it found these words, then the 5 prong pre packaged delivery is injected, meaning 5 automatic posts are inserted, with the first one auto generating the other 4 posts at random designated times with deltas in a range of 10 to 30 minutes. Note that all 4 posts are linked to each other, forming a chain of posts with a common driver (root).
Then, as q said, "shills log and send new info back to ASF for instruction." with ASF probably referring to the APACHE SOFTWARE FOUNDATION.
see attached snip taken from:
https://www.apache.org/foundation/
Also as you may or may not remember, Q used "APACHE" as a signature, and told us to dig it. An anon found out before that it is connected to the Securedrop whistleblower honeypot fiasco, but it could have multiple meaning with one of the being the ASF, or in fact the ASF can be connected to securedrop as well (see attached q snip).
Manual script inserted by a human operator:
on an older bread I played a little trolling game with the spambot. I exposed 3 of his lies on purpose, to see if in fact there is a human operator that can edit the next automatically generated reply, before it gets posted, in real time, via a script. "Trolling is fun".
Here is the experiment:
trolled it once:
>>4351198 pb
and received a manually inserted script.
>>4351259 pb
trolled it a second time:
>>4351407 pb
and received a manually inserted script to an automatic template.
>>4351463 pb
attached are the snips of the second trolling and reply that included the manual insertion.
my conclusion: there is a human operator that does exactly that, he can manually interupt the automatic generation of posts and either pick a different one or insert a specific line.
bullshit shill garbage. recycled from farrakhan and david duke.
>Did Jews dominate the slave trade?
>Not according to scholars that have closely examined the question. Several studies of the Jewish role in the slave trade were conducted in the 1990s. One of them, by John Jay’s Faber, compared available data on Jewish slave ownership and trading activity in British territories in the 18th century to that of the wider population. Faber concludes that the claim of Jewish domination is false and that the Jewish role in slavery was “exceedingly limited.” According to Faber, British Jews were always in the minority of investors in slaving operations and were not known to have been among the primary owners of slave fleets. Faber found that, with few exceptions, Jews were minor figures in brokering the sale of slaves upon their arrival in the Americas, and given the urban-dwelling propensity of most American Jews, few accumulated large rural properties and plantations where slave labor was most concentrated. According to Faber, Jews were more likely than non-Jews to own slaves, but on average they owned fewer of them.
https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-the-african-slave-trade/
>Overall, though, the conclusions Korn drew from his data were very different: he made a strong and persuasive case that there were few Jews in the planting class in the South, that Jews had historically been forced into commercial enterprises, that in the Old South they were typically city dwellers, that a small number participated in the domestic slave trade, that they treated their slaves no better or worse than other slaveholders, and that the few Jews in the South without exception endorsed slavery. The thrust of Korn's article was that Jews were not much different from other white southerners in their views on race and slavery.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1995/09/slavery-and-the-jews/376462/
you meant leftist soros puppets, bot operator.
^^^^^^^^^
reminder above is a propaganda spambot
below is a detailed bot behavior analysis:
Manual script inserted by a human operator:
on an older bread I played a little trolling game with the spambot. I exposed 3 of his lies on purpose, to see if in fact there is a human operator that can edit the next automatically generated reply, before it gets posted, in real time, via a script. "Trolling is fun".
Here is the experiment:
trolled it once:
>>4351198 pb
and received a manually inserted script.
>>4351259 pb
trolled it a second time:
>>4351407 pb
and received a manually inserted script to an automatic template.
>>4351463 pb
attached are the snips of the second trolling and reply that included the manual insertion.
my conclusion: there is a human operator that does exactly that, he can manually interupt the automatic generation of posts and either pick a different one or insert a specific line.
kek silly bot operator…
your source talks about alleged jewish involvement in roman slave trade not african.
shill hq sure sends retards tonight.