>org/deeplinks/2018/02/fosta-would-be-disaster-online-communities
fyi Barlow founded eff, a partner of fpf, clowns.
So for all the sliding and concernfagging, this bill is only retroactive in the sense that it is but a clarification of existing law, that it is not meant to impede existing law.
It's literally clarifying that 47 U.S.C. 230 never intended to exempt website owners from prosecution over illegal activity, which includes "reckless disregard."
An act of proceeding to do something with a conscious awareness of danger, while ignoring any potential consequences of so doing. Reckless disregard, while not necessarily suggesting an intent to cause harm, is a harsher condition than ordinary negligence.
No wonder EFF(FPF Clowns) are against it.
So, unless CM is grossly negligent without concern for injury to others, then there's nothing to worry about.
eg knowing the boards are being used to traffic kids and just dgaf.
Agreed. Intent (mens rea) is covered under reckless disregard.
Not our battle.
Clown scare, like the gun grab, to hijack and weaponize anons against legit efforts to end human trafficking.
These people are SICK.
There is no Universe where willful, wanton, RECKLESS DISREGARD slippery slopes into plain old-fashioned negligence.
Someone tell CM, it's going to be OK.
>= attack on 1A
>shootings = attack on 2A
Close, but the fake 1A scare is to undermine laws going after human traffickers.
Just like the school shootings/gun grab is to undermine Constitutional law.
Nothing to be afraid of H.R. 1865, just like nothing to be afraid of the 2nd Amendment.
Unless, that is, you're trafficking kids. In which case, be very afraid.