Anonymous ID: f7f371 Jan. 26, 2019, 1:14 a.m. No.4913840   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3843 >>3848 >>3883 >>3907 >>4052 >>4166

Alabama Election Meddling Timeline 3.0

1-26-19, PAGE 1 OF 3

 

This digg is like an octopus: keeps expanding in multiple directions. If you have not read up on this topic, start with older diggs (there are dozens; see >>4883279 pb). The problem at this point is understanding how the pieces fit together.

Why don't they fit so far? Because the MSM is trying to keep the story contained. So it provide partial accounts that blur out key details. For example, it is said that WaPo, Buzzfeed, and NYT all have copies of one or more reports upon which their stories are based, but what is published is either incomplete or their filtered interpretation of the report(s).

This timeline updates a previous timeline update (>>4833587 pb). If you haven't read it yet, you might want to first; it's simpler.

Three of the CAPPED articles are from Dec 17 (WaPo & NYT) and World Socialist website (to give context to Alabama story); the 4th is an obscure but excellent piece from World Socialist website. Two are new; others posted for easy reference.

The main purpose of this updated timeline is make it easier to understand the signicance of this story–how it points to so much more than just a Senate election in Alabama.(Details/links on PAGES 2 and 3).

 

TIMELINE 3.0 (now starts in Sept 2018; see pages 2 & 3 for links)

 

''Below is an update of the timeline from >>4816012 pb plus article CAPS: one from Morgan (posted pb but hard to read) and WaPo (new post). This info is complex; tried to make it accurate but plz read with care.''

 

EARLY SEPT 2018: NYT reporter Scott Shane attends an AET meeting where Mikey Dickerson & Sara Hudson detail the results of using social media to influence the 2017 Senatorial election in Alabama.

 

DEC 17:Both NYT and WaPo assert in splashy articles the results of "research" done by New Knowledge and others showing that Russian disinfo teams targeted the 2016 elections. Shane is lead author for NYT piece. Both articles righteously proclaim the need to guard against foreign interference in future elections. See CAP.

 

DEC 18: World Socialist website expresses skepticism about the "supposed" efforts of Russian to meddle in US elections. Reveals the name of the report given by NK to SSCI: "The Tactics & Tropes of the Internet Research Agency." See CAP.

 

DEC 18:Somehow, information is released (from somewhere) about "questionable tactics" being used in the 2017 Alabama Senate race. WaPo releases a very short article announcing this but does not give details how it knows.

 

DEC 19: Shane publishes the NYT "Secret Experiment" article indirectly referenced in Post 2635. Describes Project Birmingham but makes no mention about the role of AET, although Shane knew it in Sept (see below).

 

DEC 27: Buzzfeed publishes a story about Scott Shane being at a Sept 2018 conducted by AET, where Shane learns that that AET ran the anti-GOP fake bot campaign.

 

DEC 27 & 28: Sputnik runs 2 stories: first one discusses how New Knowledge sometimes mistakes real people for trolls; second one reports on Buzzfeed's claim of having a New Knowledge report that proves election meddling

 

DEC 31: World Socialist website summarizes events to date in a much less biased way than the US MSM; lots of DIGG leads here. See CAP.

 

JAN 2: Jonathon Morgan says his company only conducted a small experiment, nothing that could throw an election.

 

JAN 6: WaPo publishes an article referring to a 12-page doc titled "Project Birmingham," that seems to show Project Birmingham wasn't just an expt but an effort to throw an election.

 

JAN 11: In an interview, NYT author Shane "forgets" that AET organized Project Birmingham; implies it was done by New Knowledge. No mention of AET at all.

Anonymous ID: f7f371 Jan. 26, 2019, 1:14 a.m. No.4913843   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3844 >>3848 >>3883 >>3907 >>4052 >>4166

>>4913840

 

DETAILS ON ALABAMA ELECTION MEDDLING TIMELINE 3.0

1-26-19, PAGE 2 OF 3

 

When Q gave us a reference to the Fox article from 12-20-18 on Alabama election interference, MSM accounts described it as "small experiment" that supposedly was not designed to actually affect the outcome of a special 2017 Senatorial election in Alabama. To anons, this purposted goal did not seem credible; and indeed, subsequent research reported on this board indicated that this election meddling was all too effective, given the very slim margin by which the Dem candidate won.

 

Although the DEC 19 NYT article was said to break the story, WaPo actually released a story on the evening of Dec 18. But it was very short and not authored. Strange, right? Further digging showed the likely reason why.

 

The day before, DEC 17, both NYT and WaPo had featured articles discussing the newly-released "finding" that Russians (in particular, the Russian-based Internet Research Agency) had meddled extensively in the 2016 elections. These articles used two reports–one from Graphika and other by New Knowledge, Columbia U., and Canfield Research–to justify those claims. Renee Diresta of New Knowledge was directly quoted in both articles. WaPo opined that "the report by New Knowledge highlighted the focus on Mueller and fired FBI director James B. Comey, who was falsely portrayed as a 'dirty cop'."

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/17/us/politics/russia-2016-influence-campaign.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/russian-disinformation-teams-targeted-robert-s-mueller-iii-says-report-prepared-for-senate/2018/12/17/0e0047f6-0230-11e9-8186-4ec26a485713_story.html?utm_term=.18dfee7235f6Both are CAPPED.

 

On DEC 18, the World Socialist website expressed skepticism about the "supposed" efforts of Russian to meddle in US elections. Also named the report just given by NK to SSCI: "The Tactics & Tropes of the Internet Research Agency"; also said that Ryan Fox was one of the authors. Very good read!

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/12/18/pers-d18.html

 

Later that day, something happened to disrupt the MSM narrative: news leaked (or was leaked) that New Knowledge was involved in some kind of project to simulate Russian bots in the 2017 Senatorial election in Alabama. Suddenly, New Knowledge lost its credibility. WaPo and the NYT had to decide how to respond. WaPo decided to de-emphasize the new story; the NYT took the opposite approach. Scott Shane–the same lead author of the DEC 17 story–published another big story about Alabama election meddling.

https://www.al.com/news/2018/12/social-media-researcher-admits-to-questionable-tactics-in-2017-alabama-senate-race.html

Anonymous ID: f7f371 Jan. 26, 2019, 1:15 a.m. No.4913844   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3848 >>3907 >>3919 >>4052 >>4166

>>4913843

 

DETAILS ON ALABAMA ELECTION MEDDLING TIMELINE 3.0

1-26-19, PAGE 3 OF 3

 

In the DEC 19 NYT story, Shane highlighted the role of New Knowledge as a primary actor in the Russian bot research in Alabama. He mentioned in passing the role of Reid Hoffman as a project donor and Mikey Dickerson's American Enterprise Technologies (AET) as an organization thru which the money was funnelled to New Knowledge. But he left out one VERY IMPORTANT DETAIL: the fact that he had in Sept 2018 attended a meeting hosted by AET in which a report was circulated revealing that AET played more than an incidental role in the Alabama meddling scheme.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/us/alabama-senate-roy-jones-russia.html

 

On DEC 27, Buzzfeed broke the story of the AET meeting in Sept and asked for Shane's comments. Shane said that during the Sept meeting, Dickerson had "detailed the results of their attempt to use social media and online ads to suppress Republican voters,'enrage' Democratic voters…and execute a 'false flag' to hurt the campaign of Roy Moore." He'd signed an NDA, which he felt justified his lack of disclosure about what he knew from this meeting.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/alabama-dirty-tricksters-invited-a-new-york-times-reporter

 

On DEC 27 & 28, Sputnik ran 2 stories: first one discussed how New Knowledge sometimes mistakes real people for trolls; second one discussed Buzzfeed's claim of having a New Knowledge report that proves election meddling

https://sputniknews.com/analysis/201812271071023951-Company-Meddling-Report-Smear-Critics-Russian-Bots/

https://sputniknews.com/us/201812281071079929-New-Knowledge-Brags-Affecting-Vote/

 

On DEC 31, World Socialist Website published another very informative report.

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2018/12/31/know-d31.html

 

After realizing he was being set up to take the fall, AET's sub-contractor, Jonathon Morgan, protested on JAN 2 that his company only conducted a small experiment, nothing designed to throw an election.

https://medium.com/@jonathonmorgan/social-media-and-the-alabama-special-election-c83350324529

 

On JAN 6, WaPo obtained a 12-page doc titled "Project Birmingham," whose authorship is in question''' (same doc as Buzzfeed's? Seems to be). It contained damning evidence that seems to show that this project was to throw an election, not just to test the "Russian bot" effect.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/secret-campaign-to-use-russian-inspired-tactics-in-2017-alabama-election-stirs-anxiety-for-democrats/2019/01/06/58803f26-0400-11e9-8186-4ec26a485713_story.html?utm_term=.3d435fdc9b0b

 

Despite his earlier remarks to Buzzfeed on the AET Sept meeting, in an interview, Shane shifted the blame back to New Knowledge; didn't even mentione AET (JAN 11).

https://www.wnycstudios.org/story/democrats-dirty-tricks-alabama-senate-race

 

''There is still a lot we don't know about this entire situation; it's still an unfolding story. The timeline fills in some of the blanks, especially re the events that took place PRIOR to the Alabama story breaking on Dec 19.''

Anonymous ID: f7f371 Jan. 26, 2019, 1:24 a.m. No.4913875   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3894

>>4913848

Nothing is wrong with 2.0. But this takes us back in time, to Sept 2018 (AET meeting) and also to Dec 17 (the day of the release of two reports celebrating how New Knowledge showed Russian election tampering).

 

VERY IMPORTANT to understanding why the Dec 18 release of info on Alabama scandal was so important. What was previously a triumph became an albatross around their necks. MSM has been trying to minimize and manage the story ever since.

 

What I want to know is who released/leaked the Alabama election fuckery just one day after the "wonderful Russian collusion news". KEK.

Anonymous ID: f7f371 Jan. 26, 2019, 1:35 a.m. No.4913919   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3925 >>3991

>>4913883

 

There is actually a 3rd page:

>>4913844

 

Re charts: As you probably know, I've been trying to generate a chart, as well. It's not a flowchart in time but a relational chart.

 

Here's the latest version, which you may have seen (posted last night). Not very pretty and still leaves out a lot but helps me think about the relationships. But if I really get ALL the info, the relationships are going to be so dense that it may not be very useful. All these guys know one another in all sorts of ways.

 

I guess the goal is to figure out how the power flows–who's in charge, who's following orders, etc.

Anonymous ID: f7f371 Jan. 26, 2019, 1:42 a.m. No.4913958   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4913938

I was thinking that, as well. It struck me that they didn't just pass this wretched abortion law because of RBG. Psychologically, I think they were really petrified by the March for Life–so much more successful than the disintegrating Women's March. That law was their revenge.

 

But I don't think it will stand. Instead, it will wake people up. Also, there are two films coming out: Unplanned and Roe v Wade. There may be others down the pike.

Anonymous ID: f7f371 Jan. 26, 2019, 1:53 a.m. No.4914001   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4913951

It's really a bizarre time. On one hand, we have the Dems creating big melodramas involving trivial non-crimes with no real victims; on the other, we have them committing terrible crimes with very real victims. This is when people get to find out who they really are–the same for those around them. It's both wonderful and terrible. Good to be here with anons, fren. WWG1WGA.

Anonymous ID: f7f371 Jan. 26, 2019, 2:04 a.m. No.4914057   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4079

>>4914007

You mean another person or org that's connected? It will probably turn up again. The connections others were running across previously (which I hadn't seen) have started showing up now in my searches. Or maybe I'm just remembering them better.

 

So I'll check in tomorrow night to see what you've posted. Do you often post and then bake?