>>4914686

Support can slip away, and allowing the narrative to roam free unchallenged is a very big flaw.

One way to counter it, if you are looking to do what's right and try to fix some shit, is to declass, but not random, it should be choreographed and have them in the pipe as the news breaks. It's suppressive fire, it's effective.

Problem is you will not be able to pick and choose the false narratives in place. IE the fbi, you cannot point out the corruption and defend the "rank and file" especially as they are involved and know this SOP for them all. It's rotten from head down.

start with post 9/11 and start the declass, prep with ground with older stuff to establish what we are looking at. It's a can of worms, and once you start you will not be able to control the outrage and direction.

The result will be the power they are fighting over will lost by both. If it returns to people we will know and feel it.

>>4914719

just the facts mam.

Who said Q drives the bus?

other than the Qfag sheep that fawn.

If the goal is to return power to the people, then we should express those desires start the declass.

Start looking at the DOJ/FBI, then move on to the CIA, and much to Q's chagrin, MIC and the NSA. Goog,fb, twitter's agreements with the gov, you can start with the fact they signed saying they cannot say what they signed. That should be challenged.

>>4914761

you w prosecuted nazi's just following orders

>>4914780

If you are focused on what is right and not who controls the shots after, I would say Yes, and Tom has shown he has our interest up front and first.

America first is not enough, we need Americans first. If it does not serve us, then what is the purpose?

>>4914807

form follows function. It's a tube(if a good one) with something like a shape charge on each end, with material in the front, the conventional explosive forces critical mass,

smaller nukes have a ball of explosive directed to the center with material is just forced together.

they are not as technical, except for the one shot, but some tactical nukes, IE old 8's new 8's were artillery and had no one shot.

>>4914844

how simple they are is scary part, if you recall they showed a pick of a NK hydrogen, with this thing sticking out on the side.

To get a real punch like that you add additional material very close to the initial critical mass explosion. That material takes it to to the next level and is way more material than needed to reach critical mass.

That said the shit is poison, and it get's on anything around it it (IE the water).

The only upside is what it takes to make that shit, centrifuges with a lot of that shit that spins and just pulls the right particles off refined material ( you can compare it to the build up on a negative car battery terminal), you are spinning it extracting takes a hell of lot and is expensive.

>>4914859

duuude, I wana party with (((YOU))).

>>4914888

that OR

>>4914901

LAW does not apply to (((THEM))).

I cannot believe someone has not made a sticky for the norm's.

>>4914920

biggest one was in Huma's purse.

>>4914924

slinging Cock like Lindsey Graham in a Daycare.

>>4914937

Let me get on that. Oh wait….

>>4914944

it was for emphasis, not effect.

>>4914922

yes I did not want to get too technical on the isotopes, and electron's. Copper with the odd electron is the build up on a negative cable, one give up an electron and it sticks to the other ( uranium in a power plant). You expose it to a magnetic field and it start a chain reaction ( passing of electrons), the water it is in has heavy ( all the oxygen removed). It has to be or you got a bomb. That moving the rods in an out of the field turn it up and down.

Plutonium is uranium that has been processed, when the nuclear reaction ( controlled in a power plant), that stuff build up plutonium, to extract it you take it from the power plant to centrifuge, spin it fast and apply a vacuum to the to the centrifuge. That creates weapons grade uranium, known as plutonium.