>>4915886
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
this anon got my point.
If a 'mother' can kill a fetus because it is 'her' body and inconvenience, you know, then why does the 'father' have to support a fetus that is part of the 'woman's' body.
Is it part of the woman's body or is it not?
It seems to me, that if you logically carry this fetus/baby/ right to your body argument, then the father could say I am not paying to support a part of that woman's body.
It is a philosophical question.
Why do I have to pay to support YOUR body part?
OR
Do young men/boys not have the same right to chose their pursuit of happiness, ie, not become a father of this fetus.
Just trying to say that there is not logic to the pro-choice argument.
where is the father's choice after he has made a mistake?