>>4913637 pb

quote: "7. There was no guidance this time that furloughed employees couldn't check their e-mail."

Though I'm not a federal employee, I do work in an office where we share space with federal employees. One agency was totally furloughed, the other agency wasn't. We locked the door to their space. NO ONE could go in that office. NO ONE including the furloughed employees. They absolutely could not check their email because they had to leave their government laptops in the building. They were strictly warned that to do so would be very bad and they could get fired. They cannot just go online and check their emails. It is all on secure federal servers that can only be accessed by certified computers. I do not know if this worked with all agencies, but this is how things worked where I am at. Plus they are tracked when they log into their computers. IT can see everything that is posted, every internet page visited, every letter written, every piece of paper printed.

>>4913594 pb

Would this help to explain the mass media layoffs? No federal funding for mockingbird reporters maybe?

>>4915845

Could be that, but the words "unprecedented" were thrown around. What could cause "unprecedented" layoffs? Gee, backdoor funding perhaps? BUZZFEED covered by saying they didn't want to draw on "outside" capital for funding. Huffpo eliminated their entire Opinion section - who btw were all liberals. The enemies of the state and who were better at spreading propaganda through their "Opinions".

>>4915876

I know!! That's what I thought - after I almost threw up when I found out POTUS had reopened the government. I knew there had to be a reason he caved. Then it hit me - why was it opened right on the heels of all the layoffs?

>>4915874

I guess only time will tell what falls by the wayside because of this. We just have to keep our eyes and ears open.

>>4915949

Oh FFS - you don't have a search bar on your computer?

>>4915957

Are you even following the thread? How hard is it to open up a browser window, type in JOURNALISTS LAYOFFS and sauce the numbers yourself?

>>4915891

Not the people who accepted, the people who suggested it and gave it to them. Normally, I would think this. However, POTUS being a kind soul who may have a plan for doing this, probably wants to minimize civilian casualties.

>>4916058

Perhaps not all, however, there are no coincidences concerning the timing. You got to get past the covering narrative to see the possibilities of the bigger picture.

>>4916094

Please follow the thread. Do you not know what operation Mockingbird is? Do you not know where the funding comes from? C_A slush funds. Funding sources are being cut off. The federal tap has been closed. Someone has to pay those Mockingbird assets. The media barons aren't going to dip into their own pockets to pay government propaganda journalists. Besides, this is just a theory based on timing and coincidence. Nothing to see here, move on.

4913594 pb

I believe as time goes by we will all begin to see the 40,000’ view of the shutdown. The possibilities are endless. Besides clearing the way for legal RIFs under the steady hand of Mulvaney, we have the possible defunding of Mockingbird journalists, the egg in her face Pelosie who for some strange reason kept running away from POTUS and the negotiating table (could it be she and him cut a backdoor deal to help drag out the shutdown to meet POTUS goals? – remember we are watching a movie. Nothing is as it seems.

Now we have this: https://newrightnetwork.com/2019/01/trump-setting-the-democrats-up.html/

Is President Trump Setting The Democrats Up?

President Trump opens the government without border wall funding, but is this really a victory for Democrats?

If you think #TrumpCaved then you have never read Art of The Deal.

— Kambree Kawahine Koa (@KamVTV) January 25, 2019

I need to buy more popcorn.