Anonymous ID: 58e328 Jan. 26, 2019, 9:03 a.m. No.4916614   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6656 >>6853

It appears Barnes was just a publicity stunt withthe Fake MAGAs

He gave media 48 hrs / until yesterday

Now he's just tweeting at them

If sincerce he would have filed and tweeted the lawsuit

Besides, Haberman had the cabal behind her

Some internent rambling attorney threatening a lawsuit is of no consequence to her

 

twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1089199099465748485

[archive.is/O5ojd]

twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1086777325356752897

[archive.is/UDswE]

Anonymous ID: 58e328 Jan. 26, 2019, 9:28 a.m. No.4916853   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6903

>>4916781

>Writing that had to really hurt those Shit Eating Faggots.

This is a perfect example of how it is done

Talk shit about FLOTUS on the 19th, one week ago / payout and apology today

>We apologise unreservedly to The First Lady and her family for any embarrassment caused by our publication of these allegations.

>As a mark of our regret we have agreed to pay Mrs Trump substantial damages as well as her legal costs.

 

Compare Barnes >>4916614

Just tweeting at Haberman

Anonymous ID: 58e328 Jan. 26, 2019, 9:38 a.m. No.4916942   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6965

>>4916903

>Yes and No on the playbook where <1% see the retraction.

Yes = Apology and payout to FLOTUS for slander and libel

No = Barnes effectively threatening MSM to retract re Covington

 

Barnes was very public, yet was not effective at all

Melania's team was stealth and for the win