I know this has been discussed here, but I just got into a disagreement with a lib while trying to redpill them, and it was quite amazing how things turned out. The way I approach redpilling is this:
Someone will say something
I'll respond with "Hey, did you know…:
And that's usually when the "fact checking"/disagreements start.
Lib friends says "Either Mueller has a shit ton of stuff on Trump, or he doesn't. But Trumps going to jail because you can't be a billionaire and not be dirty as fuck." My response, "Hey, did you know that Trump interviewed Mueller for the FBi director job, even though he wasn't qualified for it, and the next day, he was appointed head of the special counsel?"
The disagreement ensued over whether he was qualified, and limited to a single 10 year term. In fact, Mueller was granted an extra 2 years by request from Obama; the only director since the limitation was put in place since Hoover.
Lob friend stated no sources to back his claim that Mueller wasn't limited to a single term. His response was "I dont see anything saying he can't serve more than one term". I wanted to share with anons some findings just in case this dropped off the cliff somewhere, and others have had this challenge.
http://library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/document.php?id=cqal74-1224771
As reported from the Judiciary Committee Oct. 2, S 2106 (S Rept 93–1213) provided for a 10-year term for the FBI director but allowed reappointment of the director with reconfirmation by the Senate for a second term. On the floor, however, Byrd offered an amendment, adopted on a 63–8 vote, limiting the director to one 10-year term.
As you read on, not only is it a single 10 year term, the director must retire at 70, irrespective of years served.
Bob Mueller is 74.
https://www.congress.gov/congressional-report/112th-congress/senate-report/23/1